1966 Lamborghini Muira
http://www.fast-autos.net/lamborghini/miurap400.html
Price: $19,900 (1966)
Curb Weight: 2848 lbs
Layout: Mid-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Engine
Type: V12
Displacement: 3939 cc
Horsepower: 350 bhp @ 7000 rpm
Torque: 271 lb-ft @ 5100 rpm
Performance
0-60 mph: 6.7 sec
0-100 mph: 14.3 sec
Quarter Mile: 14.6 sec @ 101 mph
Top Speed: 174 mph

1962 Ferrari 250 GTO
http://www.fast-autos.net/ferrari/250gto8.html
Curb Weight: 2094 lbs
Layout: Front-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 5-Speed Manual
Engine
Type: V12
Displacement: 2953 cc
Horsepower: 295 bhp @ 7400 rpm
Torque: 250 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
Performance
0-60 mph: 5.8 sec
0-100 mph: 13.1 sec
Quarter Mile: 13.5 sec @ 102 mph
Top Speed: 170 mph

two cars, both made in italy in the '60s and both with V12 engines. Which one do you like best?

I like the old Lamborghini Muira great timeless design and one off the best sports car off its time
Btw When i where abut 8 years old we did have a Lamborghini 400 GTS Islero :)only 100 where Made.
I do remember sitting next to my father in it and I where terrified off that car :smt077

Damn rich girls... :rolleyes:

Anyways, Ferrari GTO alllllll the way...

7,400 rpms with chain driven flat camshafts, and carburators all with that timeless Ferrari sexy design means it wins hands down. This was a no contest one in my head.

It's faster, weighs EIGHT HUNDRED pounds less, and is a better performer. Only problem...rarity...39 built and at a recent Southbey's auction, one went for 9.1 MILLION US dollars.

I think I would take the Muira :eek:

I know the ferrari is more more raw, its faster and quicker, but thats why, because the 250GTO was based on the race car, and only built for homologation reasons I believe, but the Muira was designed to be the first 'supercar', it was made for the road, and for that, it wins my heart, it was not a race car for the road, it was a road car, for the race track :p you get the idea... :cool:

So easily the 250...

This is an unfair match up. The 250 GTO was basically a race car, while the Muira was a sports car. A better match would've been the '67 Ferrari 275 GTB versus the '66 Lamborghini Muira. Both were sports car for the road, and both were closer in model year. But if i had to choose, i'd go for the 250 GTO without a doubt. It's a race car.

I'll take the Miura. Timeless design, great performance, and one of the first true supercars. I always loved older lambos.

Large pics of the Miura: http://www.highresautoimages.com/1280/lamborghini/miura.html

id take the Miura because it is one of my favorite cars. basically it is one of my fav because it has the best looks out of almost any car. i dont care if the 250GTO is faster, i can make the Miura lighter and faster if desired. but i would probly take the roadster version. depends, i would have to see them in person but i think the roadster looks better.
http://fast-autos.net/lamborghini/miuraroadster.jpg

wasn't there only like, one roadster made? I like the hardtop better anyways. I'd actually take the Muira Jota if we're going for rare lamborghinis.

http://www.fast-autos.net/lamborghini/lambomiurajota.html

wasn't there only like, one roadster made? I like the hardtop better anyways. I'd actually take the Muira Jota if we're going for rare lamborghinis.

http://www.fast-autos.net/lamborghini/lambomiurajota.html
the Muira Jota is my fav Muira, I made a big post on it when i was new here, but there are a few Jota's running around Japan Europe and Australia, as orginal Muira's, converted to Jota spec in the 1970's by customers who originally had orders/planned orders for the Jota that was never made!

Sooo easily the 250 GTO that car is just beautiful.

And FYI Ghalos, the most expensive GTO went for $17M