PDA

View Full Version : Shaquille O'Neal buys smart car


trev0006
Aug 05, 2008, 11:54 PM
Shaquille O'Neal buys smart car
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/shaq_smart_450op.jpg
Standing seven feet and one inches tall and weighing in at 375 pounds, Shaquille O'Neal is one big dude. Must drive a big 'ol car then, right? Umm, not exactly. The Phoenix Suns star center has recently been spotted in his newest automotive purchase, a smart fortwo. Seriously. And, surprisingly enough, he fits! Don't believe us? See above for photo proof. Well, so he sorta fits. It's a good thing that Shaq opted for the convertible, as his head comes up several inches over the top of the windshield. Oh, and we can find no real proof that the door has ever completely shut with Shaq inside. Just sayin'.
Source: TMZ and Autoblog

SRT expert
Aug 05, 2008, 11:57 PM
............ X_X
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1382/facepalm2ly3.jpg

EDIT:Its hilarous, but there is nothing wrong with conserving the environment, ya?

lamborghini's rule all
Aug 06, 2008, 12:33 AM
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/1382/facepalm2ly3.jpg


I agree but its awesome at the same time, imagine if he had gotten to hard top:o

Robbie
Aug 06, 2008, 1:22 AM
Oh, and we can find no real proof that the door has ever completely shut with Shaq inside.

Well, smart/benz can make a bubble top for him. The doors, probably needs a wide bodykit on the left side of the car. Though, if he wanted to save gas, he would have gotten a Prius because everyone thinks it's gonna save the world AND he would probably fit in it. But he looks good in this car, everyone looks nerdy in a Prius.

But heck, look at those rims!!The smart is the new-gen pimpmobile.

mexMan
Aug 06, 2008, 1:29 AM
I have a list of modifications that would help him to fit in there
1. get a Hummer
2. sell a smart ¬¬

pphil09
Aug 06, 2008, 3:17 AM
:facepalm:

millmAn
Aug 06, 2008, 6:45 AM
Smart cars are a scam. They are nothing but smoke and mirrors.

Amjams
Aug 06, 2008, 7:30 AM
there's no way he gets enough leg room in that thing. He's just posing with the car, not driving it. Guys his size can't even fit in porsches

*#turbinas#*
Aug 06, 2008, 8:41 AM
http://www.forumammo.com/cpg/albums/userpics/10062/GF2SPGNXZHLROULQFG7HXTVSGSERTOEN.jpg

He can't drive this properly.

sabaka_g
Aug 06, 2008, 8:46 AM
I have a list of modifications that would help him to fit in there
1. get a Hummer
2. sell a smart ¬¬

I doubt he could get in through the doors of the H1. Its strange that a car is so big like H1, but the doors and the inner space is so little.

My father once driven in military H1 through the city somewhere in Afghanistan going 130km/h :D :D said lately that was interesting feeling :D :D

s204speed
Aug 06, 2008, 10:20 AM
It's better than him getting another lambo and then chopping it.

chriz00
Aug 06, 2008, 1:52 PM
Smart's have been getting popular around my area, I've seen a couple.

This is not for shaq though. His knees are next to the steering wheel. :p

Unless they make a Smart 2.5 for 2.5. :B

wesleypipes
Aug 06, 2008, 1:59 PM
This thread does not deliver.

10fails

Heretic
Aug 06, 2008, 2:07 PM
I doubt he could get in through the doors of the H1. Its strange than a car is so big like H1, but the doors and the inner space is so little.


This is true......there isn't much room in the back seat for other things either;)

02WRX
Aug 07, 2008, 3:26 PM
I watched a guy autocross one of those little buggers...damn thing was actually nimble, just slow as hell.

n wright 275
Aug 07, 2008, 3:46 PM
They are actually spacious cars. I'm a 6+ ft guy and i had no trouble driving one. neat little cars, just overpriced, girly, slow, and not so fuel efficient. A Camry hybrid gets what, 40 mpg? the same as a smart, but twice the size.

Venom 1000
Aug 07, 2008, 3:47 PM
Smart cars are a scam. They are nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Agreed. I thought my truck was slow and it still beats the Smart by a country mile. Besides being horribly slow and unsafe, they lack space and cost way too much money for 2 seats and a 3 cylinder motor.

DarkCivic01
Aug 07, 2008, 7:08 PM
WOW the rims look stupid on that car.

bossesjoe
Aug 07, 2008, 9:16 PM
I wonder if Shaq bottoms out the suspension with a passenger...

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 07, 2008, 9:20 PM
Agreed. I thought my truck was slow and it still beats the Smart by a country mile. Besides being horribly slow and unsafe, they lack space and cost way too much money for 2 seats and a 3 cylinder motor.
What are you talking about? It's as safe as an E-Class.

millmAn
Aug 08, 2008, 7:52 AM
Agreed. I thought my truck was slow and it still beats the Smart by a country mile. Besides being horribly slow and unsafe, they lack space and cost way too much money for 2 seats and a 3 cylinder motor.
Yup. They get horrible gas mileage for their size. And they require premium fuel. If you are in the market for a car that will get above 40 mpg on 87 octane, buy a Honda Fit and keep your foot out of the floor. That is my take on this gasoline conserving marketing trend that corporations are shoving down are throats.

SKR34
Aug 08, 2008, 9:12 AM
If he can fit and drive properly in it, I don't see why he shouldn't be allowed to drive it. He's making an effort to reduce the hippie smoke.

jjo
Aug 08, 2008, 11:03 AM
It'd be a smart place to store his Nikes in...

http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/8091/bluegrabkc4.gif (http://imageshack.us)

Venom 1000
Aug 08, 2008, 11:23 AM
What are you talking about? It's as safe as an E-Class.
I don't care what the car itself looked like after the crash. I saw that video too, and in reality the car may not be too bashed up but in reality the impact would kill the driver immediately. The E-Class weighs several times more than the smart. Which is going to move more when hit? The smart hitting the E-class is like hitting a brick wall, it doesn't move.

Yup. They get horrible gas mileage for their size. And they require premium fuel. If you are in the market for a car that will get above 40 mpg on 87 octane, buy a Honda Fit and keep your foot out of the floor. That is my take on this gasoline conserving marketing trend that corporations are shoving down are throats.
Ya that's pretty stupid too. If they used a larger CC motor I wouldn't be surprised if it got BETTER fuel economy. You must need to have your foot into it all the time to get moving at a decent pace. The smart's 0-60 time is about how long it takes my truck to accelerate when using part throttle, and again my truck feels slow. And this is coming from someone who never really drove anything with over 200hp. lol

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 08, 2008, 3:24 PM
I don't care what the car itself looked like after the crash. I saw that video too, and in reality the car may not be too bashed up but in reality the impact would kill the driver immediately. The E-Class weighs several times more than the smart. Which is going to move more when hit? The smart hitting the E-class is like hitting a brick wall, it doesn't move.


Ya that's pretty stupid too. If they used a larger CC motor I wouldn't be surprised if it got BETTER fuel economy. You must need to have your foot into it all the time to get moving at a decent pace. The smart's 0-60 time is about how long it takes my truck to accelerate when using part throttle, and again my truck feels slow. And this is coming from someone who never really drove anything with over 200hp. lol
Oh is this why they got a high safety rating.

leka-S
Aug 08, 2008, 4:44 PM
Yeah right, would you test crash that or an E-Class

Since the Smart is 'safer' I guess you'd pick that

The car may be strong in accidents, but people aren't

The 4-2 has less space then the trunk of my KIA, prove me wrong

frewin1987
Aug 08, 2008, 5:23 PM
actually, you'd seriously be surprised how much space there is in a smart fortwo... although im not saying a 7.1'' bloke could easily fit in! jesus... lol

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 08, 2008, 5:52 PM
Yeah right, would you test crash that or an E-Class

Since the Smart is 'safer' I guess you'd pick that

The car may be strong in accidents, but people aren't

The 4-2 has less space then the trunk of my KIA, prove me wrong
The funny part is that the smart car would do better in a crash then your KIA.

leka-S
Aug 09, 2008, 1:49 PM
Yeah, that's why my 4.5 meter KIA, weighting 1490Kg, and having 11 airbags has got a 5-star rating (front and side) from EURONCAP
Compare that to the 4-2
You'd be surprised how dumb you sounded:D

I have no idea why you guys here hate KIA so much :|

frewin1987
Aug 09, 2008, 10:37 PM
The funny part is that the smart car would do better in a crash then your KIA.

it wouldnt, though. in a way, yes - the smartcar would 'look' better (i.e. it'd hardly crush), but that's because of the super-strong steel shell it uses, which in turn absorbs less energy from the collision. the kia, however, is designed to crush and crumble to absorb the energy from the crash. when you crash in a smart car, less energy is transferred through the body, and more is gonna be transferred through you - imagine braking softly (the kia), and then braking harder (the smart) - that's what im talking about, more g-forces put on your body.

all this crap that they say about their 'tridion safety shell' absorbing the energy as well as not deforming is a load of crap. you cant defy physics, can you?

Just4fuN
Aug 10, 2008, 3:16 PM
Regardless of the safety rating of the car (and assuming that Shaq could actually drive the car for any period of time, or that a smart could generate any real 'speed'), I think he's in serious trouble if he rolls the thing. He's not the low-center-of-gravity type, so it's possible, and it'll be all forehead contacting the pavement.

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 11, 2008, 7:45 PM
Yeah, that's why my 4.5 meter KIA, weighting 1490Kg, and having 11 airbags has got a 5-star rating (front and side) from EURONCAP
Compare that to the 4-2
You'd be surprised how dumb you sounded:D

I have no idea why you guys here hate KIA so much :|
And you'd be surprised at how much I laughed at that retarded statement.
it wouldnt, though. in a way, yes - the smartcar would 'look' better (i.e. it'd hardly crush), but that's because of the super-strong steel shell it uses, which in turn absorbs less energy from the collision. the kia, however, is designed to crush and crumble to absorb the energy from the crash. when you crash in a smart car, less energy is transferred through the body, and more is gonna be transferred through you - imagine braking softly (the kia), and then braking harder (the smart) - that's what im talking about, more g-forces put on your body.

all this crap that they say about their 'tridion safety shell' absorbing the energy as well as not deforming is a load of crap. you cant defy physics, can you?
Actually, the tridion safety shell does deform at numerous locations that would absorb the impact. It's design is complicated that in a crash, you would still be able open the door at a collision - very convenient for the rescuers.

Also, the Tridion safety shell is suppose to transfer the force AROUND the cabin and to the rear so that the passenger has a better chance of surviving. Trust me, you would better be off in a smart car than a KIA.

Driftster
Aug 11, 2008, 7:48 PM
Hey thread, tell me how my ass tastes

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 11, 2008, 7:49 PM
Hey thread, tell me how my ass tastes
WTF!? LOL!!!!!! That is the most random post man... seriously.

Venom 1000
Aug 11, 2008, 8:04 PM
Hey thread, tell me how my ass tastes
lol what a random ass post
Oh is this why they got a high safety rating.
Would you trust it? Sh1t man I wouldn't. Smart is a gimmick in every way, what makes you think the "safety rating" isn't some made up crap too? Look, there's no crumple zones in that car, I mean you can barely fit in it as it is. What part of the car would move? Are you saying the force transfers to the back and the back crumples and nobody feels the impact in the cabin? rofl


Regardless of energy transfer, there's no crumple zone to ease the impact, to slow YOU down. You die.

leka-S
Aug 12, 2008, 9:14 AM
Ok MMF1 maybe my KIA would be in worse shape then the the 4-2 after a crash
But I would still be alive in my KIA, and you wouldn't in your beloved 4-2

PS: you didn't deny that you sounded dumb :D

SRT expert
Aug 12, 2008, 9:20 AM
Hey thread, tell me how my ass tastes


ROFL! Worst freestyle ever. How did this man first CD went Platnium... X_X. Worst CD I ever heard, next to that ***got Chingy...

Driftster
Aug 12, 2008, 9:32 AM
Lol don't dis shaq diesel! He'll shaq-fu your ass to steele ville in a kazaaming instant....

Anyway, smart cars are like on 3 year back order, if I could get one at a dealership I would simply because my girl has an aveo, and smarts look 30x better imho. Although I could see her aveo with somenew bmw pewter paint aloys and tint

*#turbinas#*
Aug 12, 2008, 9:37 AM
Hey thread, tell me how my ass tastes
LOL :lol:

Weird posts in SCF lately! :D

SRT expert
Aug 12, 2008, 9:39 AM
*Raises eyebrow*

http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o316/Ty1986/Shaq_Fu_gen_ScreenShot1.jpg
:smt021... No, he's going to use his Shaqurkin!!!!!!!!!!! Then, hes going to get raped in the corner! I played the game... He better stick to selling his piss samples for 6-figures...

AWDfreak
Aug 12, 2008, 12:58 PM
The Smart Car is becoming EXTREMELY common these days. Every day I'm out on the road (not driving, sadly), I notice there's more Smarts out on the road as time passes. Apparently, gas prices are beginning to rape people's logic to save money.....

Roadkill
Aug 12, 2008, 1:13 PM
I bet he can pick it up all by himself.

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 12, 2008, 4:15 PM
Ok MMF1 maybe my KIA would be in worse shape then the the 4-2 after a crash
But I would still be alive in my KIA, and you wouldn't in your beloved 4-2

PS: you didn't deny that you sounded dumb :D
You don't make any sense.

If your KIA is in worst shape, your chances of surviving is lower. Please double check what you're trying to do/argue.

leka-S
Aug 12, 2008, 4:46 PM
Smart 4-2

Look how much stuff get's into the cabin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ju6t-yyoU8s


KIA cee'd

Look at how the cabin stays intact:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f2h0NNwXC_Q

hyphon12
Aug 12, 2008, 5:05 PM
Thats the old 4-2, the newer one is a lot safer than that one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mz-s1sIoLhU

leka-S
Aug 12, 2008, 7:16 PM
It is better then the old one, but not everyone buys brand new cars

But it still is pretty small, and as you can see, in the first crash it bounces to the right for a car length, doesn't sound a lot but:
-if you crash in 4 lane road, you bounce to the lane on your right, and BAM!! an 18-wheeler hits you :D

In the side crash, look at the neck of the guy
If he was human, he would have severe neck damage

And what if the head on collision would have been at a greater speed ??
Would the Smart bounce to the side, or would it become a plane ??

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 12, 2008, 10:15 PM
It is better then the old one, but not everyone buys brand new cars

But it still is pretty small, and as you can see, in the first crash it bounces to the right for a car length, doesn't sound a lot but:
-if you crash in 4 lane road, you bounce to the lane on your right, and BAM!! an 18-wheeler hits you :D

In the side crash, look at the neck of the guy
If he was human, he would have severe neck damage

And what if the head on collision would have been at a greater speed ??
Would the Smart bounce to the side, or would it become a plane ??
What you're saying is ALL subjective.

What you're saying is that your KIA hits a car and bounces off and at the same time, a boeing 747 does an emergency landing right on top of your car and your car gets crushes.

It's just ALL subjective.

leka-S
Aug 13, 2008, 9:42 AM
Chances of being hit by a car are bigger then being hit by a plane

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 13, 2008, 2:24 PM
None the less, it's still subjective and you cannot argue about something that can or cannot happen.

leka-S
Aug 13, 2008, 4:50 PM
If you go sideways in a four lane straight road the chances of getting hit are enourmous

If you wanna proove it, take an RC car and send it passing through a road like that
It is gonna get hit one time or another
Now, I do believe that the 4-2 is actually bigger then a regular RC car

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 13, 2008, 9:40 PM
You're still not proving any point.

leka-S
Aug 14, 2008, 2:19 PM
Yeah maybe I don't, but at least I proved that the cee'd is safer then the 4-2
You didn't

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 14, 2008, 2:22 PM
WTF??? LOLOLOLOL


You didn't prove anything. And in english, anything means EVERYTHING so you didn't prove that your KIA is safer. Period.

Venom 1000
Aug 14, 2008, 3:42 PM
Just because the Smart would be in better shape that doesn't mean it's safer. In fact, the more crumpled up the car looks after the crash, the more it slowed you down before the impact. (provided it isn't crumpled to the point where you got crushed of course). But they used to build race cars as ridgid as hell, and the car was fine in the crash but the driver was dead because there was nothing absorbing the impact. That's why F1 cars fly apart so easily these days because they build the bodies to absorb impacts. Case closed, a 700lb vehicle will never be safer than a 2 tonne vehicle, especially with no crumple zones.

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 14, 2008, 4:03 PM
^^ I can prove you wrong.


Those Chinese SUV's are heavier than the smart, much larger than the smart, but the crash test seems to speak for itself.

leka-S
Aug 14, 2008, 4:05 PM
Exactly as Venom said, you're just being a badge whore on this one MMF1, just because the smart is in the same family of MB doesn't mean it's good

It's overpriced, you've gotta admit that and it's ugly, and it's not safe to passengers

Who cares if the car stands well the crash if you're dead

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 14, 2008, 6:32 PM
Exactly as Venom said, you're just being a badge whore on this one MMF1, just because the smart is in the same family of MB doesn't mean it's good

It's overpriced, you've gotta admit that and it's ugly, and it's not safe to passengers

Who cares if the car stands well the crash if you're dead
First of all, I'm not being a badge whore, second of all, I never said it wasn't overpriced. Third of all, it's safer than your KIA. Period.

Venom 1000
Aug 14, 2008, 8:04 PM
^^ I can prove you wrong.


Those Chinese SUV's are heavier than the smart, much larger than the smart, but the crash test seems to speak for itself.

What do you mean it speaks for itself? The only way it could speak for itself is assuming the less damaged car is the safer one. Not true.

leka-S
Aug 15, 2008, 4:35 AM
First of all, I'm not being a badge whore, second of all, I never said it wasn't overpriced. Third of all, it's safer than your KIA. Period.

You are being a badge whore, you're comparing just the makes and not the models

It's not safer then my KIA, until you prove to me it is
And stop saying 'crash test'
While we're talking about crash tests, my KIA got a 5 star rating front and side
I don't remember how much the 4-2 got, enilghten me

And I do know that a 5 star rating it's the best a car can get
SO explain how could the cee'd be unsafe

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 15, 2008, 5:16 AM
And what you're saying can be turned around and I can say you're a KIA badge whore.


P.S. I don't like the smart car but it doesn't mean it's not safe, and that does not make me a badge whore. Learn the definition.

leka-S
Aug 15, 2008, 6:44 AM
I'm not a KIA badge whore, and why do you hate KIA so much ??

Why, just give me a freaking reason and I'll tell you if you're right or not, cause after all I own a KIA and I know much more on my car then you do

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 3:01 PM
You can't really be a KIA badge whore... I mean Mercedes-Benz is a "badge" name. It's famous like Ferrari or Lamborghini. You pay for those names. How can you be a KIA badge whore when it doesn't even have a "badge" name?

hyphon12
Aug 15, 2008, 3:09 PM
will you stop arguing about something so stupid, Kia has 5 star Euro NCAP and so does the Smart, they both protect the driver and passenger(s) on a similar level, so just end this.

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 3:52 PM
The Smart is safe.. for its size that is:p

Cornelius Van
Aug 15, 2008, 3:55 PM
Hang on a second, I'm confused here.

How did a basketball player/bad rapper buying a tiny inefficient car warrant a thread?

hyphon12
Aug 15, 2008, 3:56 PM
@ Venom 1000 Euro NCAP isn't rated for the size of car, it rates all the cars the same way at the same level. 5 star NCAP is the highest so they both achieved the maximum available. Its mainly rated by how much it protects those inside but the 5/5 is only given if the car is also less harmful to a pedestrian if in accident like a soft bonnet or a certain shaped front end to do less damage to someone's internal organs, limbs as well has the skull.

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 3:58 PM
I still don't understand how the Smart can be safe. I want a very technical article. Doesn't look very safe. lol it actually BOUNCED BACK http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZs1QuHerTU

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 4:02 PM
Hang on a second, I'm confused here.

How did a basketball player/bad rapper buying a tiny inefficient car warrant a thread?
Hey good point man. Wtf are we talking about anyways? lol

hyphon12
Aug 15, 2008, 4:06 PM
because mmf1 and Leka-S are arguing that about the Kia Ceed and Smart fortwo. which is rather pointless.

and video you posted is of the Old ForTwo which is a lot more unsafe compared to the new one.

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 5:43 PM
The new one would still bounce back, thanks to its low curb weight, causing serious whiplash.

leka-S
Aug 15, 2008, 6:17 PM
I'm not being a badge whore, I'm just sharing my experience with a car
But you all get on me cause you hate KIAs for no reason

mclaren_mercedes_f1
Aug 15, 2008, 7:57 PM
At what point did I hate KIA's? HOW? Is trying to prove a point that a car is safer than yours make me hate KIA's? WOW... I don't know what they teach up there but damn.

Venom 1000
Aug 15, 2008, 10:04 PM
He's assuming you hate them because he feels it's ridiculous to even propose that a Smart is safer. That's what I'm seeing.

Car_buff
Aug 15, 2008, 10:45 PM
just wondering, but has anyone ever thought of using Shaq's carcass as a tool shed when he's dead?

seriously, those bones should be big enough to make a moderate sized, well, shack

no?

*sigh* i didn't think so...

clutch
Aug 16, 2008, 4:58 AM
Holy freaking crap.

http://img37.picoodle.com/data/img37/3/8/16/f_ThreadDirecm_8d75ec1.jpg (http://www.picoodle.com/view.php?img=/3/8/16/f_ThreadDirecm_8d75ec1.jpg&srv=img37)

A congrats goes out to Shaq for getting the "trendy" car of today. Too bad he isn't up to par with other centers today. He breaks down more than any MB product ever could.

Venom 1000
Aug 16, 2008, 9:01 AM
Hey, it's still relatively on topic. We're still talking about the Smart.

lambo or holden
Aug 16, 2008, 1:17 PM
will you stop arguing about something so stupid, Kia has 5 star Euro NCAP and so does the Smart, they both protect the driver and passenger(s) on a similar level, so just end this.
Actually the Smart fortwo and forfour both achived 4 stars in the Euroncap where as the C'eed has a five star rating. Also the Smart City coupe has only got 3 stars.
Here
http://www.euroncap.com/carsearch.aspx?make=e17ea43b-216c-4508-9a1e-7175b61ac0f2&class=a18a311b-f3c5-47a8-92a7-15e294350858
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/Kia_Cee%27d_2007/297.aspx

I'd say the Kia is the safer car.

leka-S
Aug 16, 2008, 3:22 PM
Finally someone to back up my version :D