View Full Version : Z8 vs. Z8
Kirstyn
Oct 09, 2004, 2:16 PM
Just wondering which one people would prefer, these are my two favorite cars :wink: The Z8 Alpina or the Z8
2002 Bmw Z8
http://www.fast-autos.net/bmw/z824.jpg
394 HP
369 Torque
)-60 in 4.2
6SPD MT
2003 Bmw Z8 Alpina
http://carad.ebayimg.com/i9/01/a/02/84/14/72_4.JPG
375 HP
369 Torque
0-60 4.8
5SPD TipTronic
SpeedMuse
Oct 09, 2004, 9:17 PM
I'm guessing that the Alpina is just the hardtop variant? I dont know too much about the Z8, but I'd go with the 2002 Z8 because you get droptop fun and its also faster. My opinion might change if there is a difference in prices between the two... Please post the prices if possible.
Kirstyn
Oct 09, 2004, 9:20 PM
the 2002 costs 132k, the 2003 costs 138k, no they both have removable hard tops, its just different pics sorry about the confusion
SpeedMuse
Oct 09, 2004, 9:46 PM
:lol: Just shows how much I know about the Z8. I thought it had a ragtop...
Kirstyn
Oct 09, 2004, 9:47 PM
it does have a rag top underneath the removable hardtop...
with any z8, you can either have the top down, the rag top up, or the hardtop up...
Mopar68
Oct 09, 2004, 10:38 PM
so this is like comparing a ferrari 360 mondena to a 360 spyder.
Vectra GTS
Oct 10, 2004, 12:08 AM
I think its more like comparing a car with different body kits and minor engine tweaks.
SubaruKid37
Oct 10, 2004, 10:00 AM
I think its more like comparing a car with different body kits and minor engine tweaks.
yup, Alpina is like the Brabus of Mercedes... they used to do some real work on the cars, but now they seem to have softened up...
Attaus
Oct 10, 2004, 2:40 PM
No, Alpina is like West Coast Customs. They add purely asthetic modifications. Incase you missed it, the base model has a 0 - 60 time of 4.2 seconds accompanied by 394 horses, while the Alpina has a 0 - 60 time of 4.8 seconds and 375 horsepower. No doubt about it, I can skip the larger wheels, base model all the way.
Dimitris
Oct 10, 2004, 2:47 PM
I like 2002 Bmw Z8 just for the engine..... alpina rims sux!!
Kirstyn
Oct 10, 2004, 3:35 PM
the alpina one is slower because it has a tiptronic tranny not a 6spd with ///M5 engine
SubaruKid37
Oct 10, 2004, 4:43 PM
No, Alpina is like West Coast Customs. They add purely asthetic modifications.
who?
doesnt matter, like I said, they softened up, too much :lol: I saw an old Alpina '7-series' racing an older 993?? Porsche RS on the motorway in heavy rain, we were speeding at 90mph, they both shot past, and the Alpina was in front. Also I have followed some Alpina's off roundabouts and junctions.... they are faster than normal BMW's. But the new Alpina's do seem to be purely aesthetic changes, not engine changes like the older ones...
PRCHRIS212
Oct 11, 2004, 12:09 AM
Both cars are are soooo last summer anyway.
FR500
Oct 11, 2004, 12:16 AM
Alpinas were suppossed to be fast, there is a 3series alipina now that IS faster than a 330,, the Z8 is another thing, it's supposed to be a more streetable variant, the engine is tuned for drivabily, supposedly has more torque at lower revs, it's more luxury and charm than the Z8, just for thse who don't think Z8 is enough
Ummmm old alipna B23s................yummy /(i think thats the name), saw one racing a sapphire rs cosworth and it was awesome, the sapph punished it in the curves though.
Kirstyn
Oct 11, 2004, 12:19 AM
however, in mid to late 2003 bmw sold only the alpina version
Ghalos
Oct 11, 2004, 2:45 PM
Ok, if someone can tell me the Z8 had an optional hard top then the one I saw in Florida yesterday was a stock one, otherwise, it's IDENTICAL, color and all, to the Alpina.
Which, I still just prefer that <a target="_blank" href="http://searchmiracle.com/text/search.php?qq=Sex">sex</a>y roadster look of the original. 8)
jimkk29
Oct 11, 2004, 4:26 PM
I'd get the stock Z8, it's awesome even without the Alpina mods, and it's got a manual transmission as well....
dark_hunter
Oct 11, 2004, 4:44 PM
Why pay more for a the same car that is slower then the stock?
I'm with the original.
I'd probably rather buy an M3 and an M5 than the Z8.
Yes I know it wouldn't be the same as owning a semi-rare ragtop roadster, but the M's are both beautiful cars that can perform. I would take them over the Z8 any day.
Kirstyn
Oct 12, 2004, 5:11 PM
i wouldn't call it semi-rare, there were only 444 z8 alpinas made, all with numbered tags inbetween the seats...
Dimitris
Oct 12, 2004, 6:52 PM
I'd probably rather buy an M3 and an M5 than the Z8.
Yes I know it wouldn't be the same as owning a semi-rare ragtop roadster, but the M's are both beautiful cars that can perform. I would take them over the Z8 any day.
i think i will agree with you an M3 is better
puggles89
Oct 12, 2004, 6:59 PM
Both cars are are soooo last summer anyway.
are man you take cars just like fashion dont you? what do you think about a 1992 Rx7? bet you dont see their potential do you?
Kirstyn
Oct 12, 2004, 9:04 PM
Both cars are are soooo last summer anyway.
are man you take cars just like fashion dont you? what do you think about a 1992 Rx7? bet you dont see their potential do you?
i wonder what he thinks about the 2002 nissan skyline gt-r vspec?? i'm sure he thinks its just trash...
what about the 1964 Ferrari 250 GTO...
psh
Oct 13, 2004, 12:39 AM
I guess I didn't figure the Alpina Z8s were very rare because I saw one sitting at a local dealership for a couple of months before it moved anywhere.
HiMyNameIsMarwin
Oct 20, 2004, 7:24 PM
For me, the Z8 shouldn't have a top at all. Some roadsters just look plain awful with a top on. For example, the Chevy SSR, the Mazda MX-5, Honda's S2000. If Carrol Shelby's Cobra had a top on it, the driving effect of a roadster is gone.
Kirstyn
Oct 20, 2004, 8:48 PM
For me, the Z8 shouldn't have a top at all. Some roadsters just look plain awful with a top on. For example, the Chevy SSR, the Mazda MX-5, Honda's S2000. If Carrol Shelby's Cobra had a top on it, the driving effect of a roadster is gone.
the ssr is ALWAYS ugly, true, the miata is ugly w/ top, i dont mind the s2000, but i think the hard top on the z8 looks quite nice
HiMyNameIsMarwin
Oct 23, 2004, 1:06 AM
The purpose of roadsters: To not have a top, to have the wind in your face, and to have a refresing "sunday drive",IMO
Tops are just made for roadsters to make them "practical" for other seasons. But i haven't really seen a top on a roadster that looked "right".
ViperF556
Oct 23, 2004, 9:12 AM
2002 model for me. Looks better in an overall state to me. The 2003, well, it's not bad.
s40kTaNG
Nov 13, 2004, 11:26 AM
you guys all have good points, and i remember someone mentioning that the alpina has an auto earlier.. but that's the thing! that's the only reason why they made an alpina.. i remember reading the article when they first introduced it... it was for those who loved the Z8 but couldn't handle the stick and the 'hardcore-ness' of the car, and so they dropped an auto tranny in there and that' was the entire objective of building alpina Z8's. they weren't doing it to 'soup it up' or modify it to make it faster... they just wanted to respond to how people felt about its everyday driveability.
jimkk29
Nov 14, 2004, 5:35 PM
Sooooo lame, if it is true... I'm disappointed now. :(
Kirstyn
Nov 14, 2004, 5:38 PM
actually the alpina version came standar with 20in. wheels :) , and they only made 555...but yeah, slower, and automatic :mad:
vBulletin v3.6.8, Copyright © 2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by
vBSEO 3.0.0