PDA

View Full Version : '02 Bentley Continental GT -vs- '02 Jaguar R-Coupe


DarkVenom666
Aug 18, 2003, 12:06 PM
2 great British sports cars. Wich one would you prefer and why? Maybe these 2 examples will help you choose:

Bentley Continental GT

http://www.carpage.hu/continentalgt1.jpg

Jaguar R-Coupe

http://www.webwombat.com.au/motoring/news_reports/images/1octjag2.jpg

My personal vote goes to the R-Coupe, i think it's more stylish and has more sports car looks.

mallon
Aug 18, 2003, 6:13 PM
well the R Type was just a concept so no OFFICIAL details exist, but I prefer its design. I think the back of the Continental looks a little odd.

id have the have the R Type if you can assume it would have similar power, aorund 550BHP.

DarkVenom666
Aug 18, 2003, 6:28 PM
I agree, i prefer the R-Coupe's design too. Finally some new, sportive lines on a Jaguar. I even like it over all other current Jaguars. And i also don't like the Continental's rear, it doesn't look like the rear of a sporscar, i think. It looks a bit like the Crossfire's rear, don't you think :? ?


id have the have the R Type if you can assume it would have similar power, aorund 550BHP.

Well, i don't think the R-Coupe even comes close to the Continental's power. The R-Coupe has a V8, the Continental has a 500hp V12. But we all can't tell yet, we'll just have to wait untill they release the official specs :( .

mallon
Aug 18, 2003, 6:35 PM
the Continental has a 500hp v12

frpom memory doesnt the Continental Have a 550BHP W12 - the same as in the Phaeton only with a twin turbo?

DarkVenom666
Aug 18, 2003, 6:38 PM
Sorry, my mistake. I meant W12, i apologize.

You could be right, it could have 50 more hp than i stated. But as far as i know, it has 500hp, though. I'll check it out.

DarkVenom666
Aug 18, 2003, 6:41 PM
Here are the engine specs i found on conceptcarz.com:

Cylinders: 12
Engine Configuration: W
Aspiration/Induction: Twin-turbocharged
Displacement: 5998 cc | 366.0 cu in. | 6.0 L.
Valves: 48. 4 valves per cylinder.
Valvetrain: NA
Horsepower: 368.0 Kw / 500 HP @ 6250 RPM
Torque: 649.5 Nm / 479 Ft-lbs @ 1600 RPM
Bore: NA
Stroke: NA
Compression Ratio: NA

zodiac
Aug 19, 2003, 4:56 AM
dey both look basicly du same

mallon
Aug 19, 2003, 7:01 AM
Here are the engine specs i found on conceptcarz.com:

Cylinders: 12
Engine Configuration: W
Aspiration/Induction: Twin-turbocharged
Displacement: 5998 cc | 366.0 cu in. | 6.0 L.
Valves: 48. 4 valves per cylinder.
Valvetrain: NA
Horsepower: 368.0 Kw / 500 HP @ 6250 RPM
Torque: 649.5 Nm / 479 Ft-lbs @ 1600 RPM
Bore: NA
Stroke: NA
Compression Ratio: NA

from most places ive looked i get the same info - 550BHP! :D

http://www.supercarsite.net/continental_gt.htm

jimkk29
Aug 19, 2003, 11:13 AM
Hmmm, hard comparison. I think I prefer the Bentley, it seems a bit more 'exotic' to me.

DarkVenom666
Aug 19, 2003, 8:32 PM
dey both look basicly du same

Exactly, that's why i think this is an interresting comparison.

from most places ive looked i get the same info - 550BHP!

Then you'll probably be right. Doesn't mean any good for the R-Coupe :wink: .

Hmmm, hard comparison. I think I prefer the Bentley, it seems a bit more 'exotic' to me.

I think the exact opposite. I think the R-Coupe is more exotic ( has a more sportive look. ). I even think the Bentley has a boring design, there's nothing special about it....

Alfa Romeo 156 GTA
Aug 19, 2003, 9:45 PM
I don't like these cars both!
Much to futuristic design!

And indeed these noses of those cars look quite much the same!

Greetz : Danny!

Schumi
Aug 20, 2003, 8:39 AM
I voted for Jaguar.It's nicer to me! :wink: And 550bhp huh?I think that's a really quick car!
:P

jimkk29
Aug 20, 2003, 9:11 AM
Hmmm, hard comparison. I think I prefer the Bentley, it seems a bit more 'exotic' to me.

I think the exact opposite. I think the R-Coupe is more exotic ( has a more sportive look. ). I even think the Bentley has a boring design, there's nothing special about it....
I didn't mean the design. I actually meant that Bentley has a more high-class name and Bentleys cars are more rare and that the name 'Jaguar' sounds a bit common to me. I see quite a lot of Jags here, but I've never seen a Bentley. Anyway, IMO.

DarkVenom666
Aug 20, 2003, 10:02 AM
Oh, i think i made a mistake there. Sorry Jim, i thought you meant the design of these cars....

I have also never seen a Bentley here, but i also haven't seen to many Jaguars. I saw a few, sure, but not much more.