During some random searches of the internet, I came across these two sites. They are simply hilarious. Dancing Bush is the better of the two IMO. :lol: High quality stuff here.
http://www.superlaugh.com/1/bushgirl.htm
http://www.miniclip.com/dancingbush.htm

the dancing bush was better, both funny though :lol: , those are random sites

Well the Vice presidential debate was last night, so maybe they aren't that random.

Well the Vice presidential debate was last night, so maybe they aren't that random.

got a point there

Debates -

Presidential - Bush was embarrased

Vice Presidential - Edwards was SCHOOLED.

Cheney for president..

hahaha but i think bush is funny without all these .....only that he talks i laugh!!!

Debates -

Presidential - Bush was embarrased

Vice Presidential - Edwards was SCHOOLED.

Cheney for president..
I'd call the Vice Presidential debate more of a draw. I mean it sucked when Edwards kept trying to sell Kerry's story to the voters and lept using his name. But it was funny when Cheney seemed to get angry. Best part was definately the question about health directed at Cheney. :lol:

BUsh just went all fubared on the people ( wtf? my sister is watching a cartoon and a van is making F1 sound effects????? :?: ) well he told us that there were no weps of mass destruction, then he said that sedam wanted weps of mass destruction or something like that. ?????? man if the dead troops came back alive they would plot something to kill bush.

Debates -

Presidential - Bush was embarrased

Vice Presidential - Edwards was SCHOOLED.

Cheney for president..
I'd call the Vice Presidential debate more of a draw. I mean it sucked when Edwards kept trying to sell Kerry's story to the voters and lept using his name. But it was funny when Cheney seemed to get angry. Best part was definately the question about health directed at Cheney. :lol:

One question - are you a democrat?

who cares if he is. bush made a mistake going into this war and now hes not fessing up by saying sadam was dangerous and wanted w.o.m.d. when infact he had no intent to attack us. thats like thinking some guy will punch you so you punch him and he turns out to be a priest and then you say it was better off punching him anyway. now we have pissed off iraq with this war and mid-easterns arent very forgiveful.

Maserati. When you watch the Debates turn up the volume and pay attention. Senator Kerry agreed that Saddam needed to be removed from power. Senator Kerry agreed that we should send troops to Iraq. He thinks that we need to send more. Saddam was a threat. He was a tryrant. He would kidnap innocent Iraqis and take them to his horror camps and decapitate them or remove their hands. If they were lucky, they would return to public society. IF they were lucky. Leaders like this do not deserve to run a country. These types of leaders are insane, just like Kim Jong Ill. You cannot simply call them up on the phone and tell them to destroy the weapons of mass destruction and give up the nuclear material. It was not a mistake to remove Saddam from power. 40 million people have been freed and nearly half of the people voting are women.

Saddam owned the rarest and most expensive car in the world. This Mercedes is valued at nearly 4 million dollars. He has gold toilets throughout his house while his country writhes in the dirt and poverty. His son, Usey or Usa has 1,107 vehicles. He has nearly every car EVER. Whenever Saddam got angry at Usey, he would just destroy an Aston Martin or Ferrari. Maybe even 2 - 4. Usey was shot in the head about 3 - 4 months ago.

America has NEVER been attacked on its own soil since 1846. I think that it was right that we sent a message that we aren't going to f*ck around. They shouldn't mess with us. Most liberals just dont get it. They dont agree with Bush, yet Kerry supports nearly the same ideas. They only support Kerry because they hate Bush. They haven't really stopped to think about what his ideas are, which are really similar to President Bushs'. In Domestic issues Edwards talked about how we need to give tax relief to the middle class. Cheney came back and told him that we HAVE given relief to the middle class, but he wouldn't know because he wasn't there to vote. Edwards has missed 333 of the 360 senate meetings. Vice President Cheney goes to the Senate meetings every Tuesday which Senator Edwards should attend, but the debate was the first time Cheney had ever met Edwards in person. Kerry / Edwards voted against supplies for our troops including body armor and weaponry. And now they criticize us for not supplying the troops with proper equipment??! I could go on and on about how Kerry is the wrong President, but my fingers are startin' to hurt. :lol:

4 More Years.

this is for maserati
http://img48.exs.cx/img48/6072/ownedk.jpg

One question - are you a democrat?
I guess so, but I cant vote. So does it really matter?

Are you a republican?

They knew saddam didn't have womd but they know the North Koreans (who are in a far shittier situation) do so they obviously don't attack them cause they will use them

One question - are you a democrat?
I guess so, but I cant vote. So does it really matter?

Are you a republican?

I was just wondering because the VP debate wasn't really a draw. :lol: Cheney took Edwards out to pasture. I agree that Bush isn't really the greatest President, but its not neccesarily him that I want to vote for, its his administration.

I have to say I am because I REALLY dont agree with the Kerry / Edwards administration. They are fools. Its basically the best that the democrats could whip up after they found out how much of a freak Dean was. I have done some intensive research and have realized that Republican is the best way to go for me. The response to Bushs "failure" is to simply speed up the War on Iraq. Basically they're implying that we're going too slow. WTF is that? We're going as fast as we friggin' can. We're not hunting down Saddam anymore. We're freeing a WHOLE DAMN COUNTRY. It takes time. The domestic issues are basically all the same. The democrats dont have different views. They have exactly the same views on medicare, education, energy, but not transportation (Kerry is in favor of mass public transportation, so say goodbye to your Civic) . They just think that they can do it better than the Republicans. B.S.

bush wanted the oils. if kerry was president he would act just the same as bush.
i hate US policy..... :evil:
The vice president as far as i know is an contractor in Iraq, the destroy the iraq to build it again to take money! also a lot of american <<souls>> dead there....
and don't say anyone they saved Iraq because all iraq hate the us
PS i am not with sadam i agree that he should go down but the humans are suffer there!!!!!!

bush wanted the oils. if kerry was president he would act just the same as bush.
i hate US policy..... :evil:
The vice president as far as i know is an contractor in Iraq, the destroy the iraq to build it again to take money!
and don't say anyone they saved Iraq because all iraq hate the us
PS i am not with sadam i agree that he should go down but the humans are suffer there!!!!!!

what new station have you been watching???
mtv new? the communist news network?

the media there hide the true!
do you think that if you go in iraq now and say that you are american you live more than 1 minute??? hahaha.... sorry.I watch Greek news!
tell what do you really think about the war???

Hahah.. great. This is what the world thinks of us because of friggin' liberal networks like CNN. Newsflash! Without Iraqi oil, WE WOULD HAVE NO GAS. No gas = no cars. No cars = no enthusiasts. You obviously skipped all 3 posts I made about how Saddam was a TYRANT who KILLED INNOCENT POEPLE. Cheney was the evil mastermind that was the CEO of Haliburton, one of the oil companies in Iraq. Who f*cking cares if he recommends his own oil company. I think he trusts his OWN oil company to do the right job. It seems as if Iraqis hate us because the only ones who love us are the rebels. If Saddam find out that people of his country do not support him, he will kill you, like a fly. We just gave Iraq a through rectal examination for W.O.M.D. which we thought he had, and he probably still does hidden in the sand. I think that Saddam was pretty pissed about it and would kill all trades for oil which would screw us over.

W.O.M.D?????? I am sure we don't know all the true about the war!!!
no matter what we believe. i am sure we don't want any of as war and dead bodies!!!

Weapons. Of. Mass. Destruction. Do you think that if Kerry was in office we would have not gone to the war? (This is aimed at Dimitris)

Weapons. Of. Mass. Destruction. Do you think that if Kerry was in office we would have not gone to the war? (This is aimed at Dimitris)
bush wanted the oils. if kerry was president he would act just the same as bush.
as i write of course not.... all presidends would make the same movements <<war>>
anyway we won't never agree.If i write what i really believe someone will ban me..... for sure :!:
Tell what do you really believe about the war? i want to <<listen>> your opinion!

This got wayyy political all of a sudden...

When election day rolls around I'm gunna make a poll. That should be interesintg...

PM me, I want in on that! :D

This got wayyy political all of a sudden...

When election day rolls around I'm gunna make a poll. That should be interesintg...
yeah nice idea :!:
did you hear the news? they saw that at the back of bush jacket seems that he was wired and they told them the answers!! :lol: !

No I missed that one. My favorite was how there was a comment about the lack of Iraqis fighting alongside the US and then the very next day there was a report about them helping the US.

I am not even going to enter this one.

bush messing up.
http://media.ebaumsworld.com/sovereignty.mov

i don't understand how some people vote for bush!!! :?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA OMG that was soooooo ridiculous!!! :lol: :lol:

i don't understand how some people vote for bush!!! :?
Yeah, but who would've known all this would happen after he was elected?

havent you noticed that most countrys hate the us now because of what bush is doing. that doesnt sound like hes making the world a safer place. not for america anyway.

Attaus and ckg690 can now consider themselves owned

the only thing that bush have done is Growing the gap with Europe and that is very bad for the Usa :(

and the only Bush i trust is my own :wink:

the only thing that bush have done is Growing the gap with Europe and that is very bad for the Usa :(

and the only Bush i trust is my own :wink:
:wink:

plus killed Iraqi people and palestinian people and afhani people anyway he kill alot......
he killed woman kids and us soldiers....

12inch, I really don't give a sh*t about what Democrats think of our President. Half of it is B.S. 90% of all liberals are misinformed. I have proven nearly every one of you wrong. But since you asked for it .. here goes:

Let's go back to the 2000 election. It was Govener George W. Bush vs. V.P. Al Gore. Btw, while we're on the topic of Al Gore, have you heard the man say ANYTHING since the 2000 election? He's dead silent. I think you could stick a fork in that man because he would be done if he was elected president. Nearly a year after his election in 2000, on September 11th, 2001, we were attacked by terrorists. Not only that, it was the first time we had ever been attacked on our own soil for 200 years.Yeah, lets stay silent. Peace is the answer. Let's just talk to them and ask them nicely not to attack us again. WRONG. War was inevitable, you just don't realize it because stupid people like Michael Moore like to brain wash you with false ideas. Heres the key point : War would've happened with ANY president, EVEN KERRY. This war wouldn't have happened if it wasn't for President Clinton. The country wasn't peaceful during his administration. Republicans just dont have people like Michael Moore with nothing better to do than look up obscure facts on the internet to tarnish his record. If President Clinton had put a stop to Iraq and taken out the Al Queda in the 90's, then we would still have the twin towers. We would still have the 50 billion we spent on the War. Incase you didn't notice, the economy was down when Bush ENTERED office. If the economy was still his fault, IT WOULD STILL BE TANKING. Infact, its slowly climbing upward. Do not give me bullsh*t like he made the economy tank when you know damn well that it was the previous administration. The bonds between us and the U.K. are still strong. The U.K. was behind us the entire time. You want to know what France and Germany were not behind us? Because they were trading and supplying Saddam Hussein with weapons for the exhcange of oil. Not because they didn't think it was right. Nice disguise huh?

Anyway, im done ranting. I would like to see one of you back up a knowledgeable resposnse in direct conflict with mine. Or any post at all

sorry 12 inch, but i think youre the one who just got...

please don´t forget this

sportscarforums.com is a forum with people from al around the world we are coming from very different political system and we are raised with different point of view.
and i have a strong feeling that this gone be thread i hate Usa VS i hate Europe
so please drop the politic bullshit this a car forum and not a politic forum



but if you want to know the main difference between Europe and the USA is that Americans think 100 years is a long time, and Europeans think 100 miles is a long drive. :D

nice joke malin........ i think we can disscus for politics too
attaus wrote:
( War was inevitable, )
thats B.S do you know that at 11 of september all jews people took a day of????
i don't have anything with the states i just hate the policy!!!!!!!!
WHY THEY KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN???? :evil: :evil: :evil:

(you just don't realize it because stupid people like Michael Moore like to brain wash you with false ideas.)
Michael Moore rulezzzzz he just gathered all the evidents that proof bush is a d!ckhead!

(The U.K. was behind us the entire time) they aren't doing it for free!!!!!

(You want to know what France and Germany were not behind us? Because they were trading and supplying Saddam Hussein with weapons for the exhcange of oil. Not because they didn't think it was right. Nice disguise huh? )
thats funny :lol: :lol: fox news says that????

Bush screwed up, not on the economy, not in Afghanistan, not in his flat out brushing off of International LAW when he and his Administration brushed off due process when tossing around INVADING ANOTHER SOVEREIGN NATION...

Having said that: http://www.sportscarforums.com/showthread.php?t=2740

That explains my views on the war in Iraq...As for Michael Moore, he's annoying at some times yes, and his movie "Farenheit 9/11" was good, but pleeease don't let it be your view as to why one should be anti-Bush. Be against a political group because their views, opinions and plans aren't in sync with your own. Not because some movie director tossed together some powerful images, strong music, and well-planned connections.

Be smart about your views, learn facts and use them to back up your arguements...

BTW:and the only Bush i trust is my own

HAHAHAHAHAH! :P

Here's a question I have :

Where would we be if Al Gore was President? I want to here some respones, then give my ideas.

Here's a question I have :

Where would we be if Al Gore was President? I want to here some respones, then give my ideas.
fvck Gore now we are talking for real things!!! we are talking about what bush DID not what Gore maybe do.....!!!!

dude attaus, iraq has nothing to do with the motherfu*king war on terror. we were attacked by bin laden and his men. there is nothing even closely in common with bin laden and sadam hussein. let me tell you this firts. when i turn 18, im going to be a republican, but that doesnt mean im going to be voting for whats best for my party, im voting for whats best for the country. now is the time to vote for whats best for the country. that being said id like to share my op[inion on why we accually went to war with iraq.

when we went to war with afganistan, i was happy. i was really pissed on the 2000-3000 people killed. i wanted bin laden OUT. but then we went into iraq and i was still pissed, not for 9/11 tho, but bercause iraq had nothing at all to do with 9/11 and that is why were in the middle east in the first place. now usually there is an economical reason to go to war and afganistan is one of the exceptions. but iraq wasnt. sadam hussein before bush used to be our ally but then other countrys started giving more money or supplys to him for his oil than we were so he was like "fu*ck you america, i dont need your money." so we went to war with him because iraq has the second largest oil deposits in the world. that is why it was so vital to get rid of saddam, so we could put in a new leader that would agree with the united states and give us oil again. ya sure freedom for the iraqies.

and trust me michael moore's fareinhight 9/11 was a good movie. it was very powerful. but i didnt get any of my opinions from the movie at all. this is just why im sure we went t war.

and attaus, have you even seen fareinhight 9/11? if you did didnt the iraqi woman screaming at the united states make you feel bad at all? her family was just normal civilians but she had 4 funerals to go to the day after we first bombed iraq. now that doesnt sound like a war on terror to me.

but iraq wasnt. sadam hussein before bush used to be our ally but then other countrys started giving more money or supplys to him for his oil than we were so he was like "fu*ck you america, i dont need your money." so we went to war with him because iraq has the second largest oil deposits in the world. that is why it was so vital to get rid of saddam, so we could put in a new leader that would agree with the united states and give us oil again. ya sure freedom for the iraqies.

exactly!!! also US trained bin laden too!!!!
maserati man. are you crazy you saw all this terror and you will be republican you just say i don't give a fvck about all those dead people i just don't wan't war in my country ......
nice philosophy!!!!!

i just hope these subjects dont divide us because we are so split on the subject. lets not let it get to us too much.

Word, I think we all know that we're just stating our opinions and that we as people are nice and not thinkin' anything less of eachother. I don't care that Attaus is pro-Bush, I like him because he's thoughtful in his responses on ANY topic. And for everyone else I feel the same. :D
GO SCF! :P

you know what i just heard. 2 suicide bombers got in the us green zone and killed a bunch of people. the presidant is telling us everything is huncky dory, so how could 2 suicide bombers get in when you have to go through 5 screenings to make sure you are ok to get in?

exactly!!! also US trained bin laden too!!!!

If we trained Osama, we could find his skinny butt and send him to jail for a veeery long time. Or we could just chain him to a wall and have the 9/11 victims families take a shot at kicking him in the nuts. That would work for me. 8)

We did, in the late 70's and early 80's the CIA trained him to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan...

What. The. F*ck. This is why America is so screwed up. So we let a CIA trained Afghani bomb the foreign ministry in the 90s and and let him get away with it? As if that's not enough, he attacks us again in 2001. Yet, he is still alive.

The Bush family had financial relationships with all the Bin Laden family (not just Osama).

The Bush family had financial relationships with all the Bin Laden family (not just Osama).
Just BTW:

A long time ago, the bin Laden family was a sponsor of Williams formula 1 team. Does that mean that Frank Williams had financial relationships with terrorists, in your opinion?

no, he was just a sponsor and bin laden didnt do anything then to make him a terrorist yet.

you don't seem to understand what happend in your oun country........

What. The. F*ck. This is why America is so screwed up. So we let a CIA trained Afghani bomb the foreign ministry in the 90s and and let him get away with it? As if that's not enough, he attacks us again in 2001. Yet, he is still alive.
Even better! Sadam was U.S. backed in the taking over of Iraq, multiple south american Dictators also had CIA backing so by putting in another in Iraq there just making problems for themsleves 30 years on.

THANKS! Now I gotta write alot more...hehe, just kiddin'...

To keep it simple and concise the CIA and US government during the cold war did ALOT of rather secretive things to finance it's Black Operations and general espionage (plus it's good to have corruptable leaders in your back pocket) and that included seeing certain dictators in power in South America. In the mideast it meant putting in power anyone who'd be nice to us and help us, we can turn a blind eye to the inhumanities being committed and as such, shoot down any UN based sanctions (since they're in our side pocket-not so much more now sadly :x ).
Now in the post cold war world there's one world superpower which means the United States has to "make-up" for the inhumanities it caused by having Saddam Hussein and other dictators in power. But here's the problem, with little international support it looks like an invasion of another sovereign nation because we lost that art for disposing of cruel leaders like in the cold war somehow...

But seeing as how the current world was shaped by about 450 years of European dominance and well, persecution in some cases (plus I'm an American after all), I don't think the US or Europe can say either is worse than the other...Or more obnoxious...

BTW: Cold rain = teh suckz0rs!

But as for down the road in Iraq, I wouldn't be worried about Iraq as much as Iran. Iran's like the neighbor next door who's always yelling at his wife and kids for being failures when in fact it is he who is the failure. Add in some scalding hot fundamentalism, a pinch of fanaticism, and a dram of nuclear capabilities and President Bush indeed invaded the wrong "terrorist" nation.

you don't seem to understand what happend in your oun country........

i meant when bin laden was a sponsor he hadnt done 9/11 yet. see what im saying?

you don't seem to understand what happend in your oun country........

i meant when bin laden was a sponsor he hadnt done 9/11 yet. see what im saying?
i didn't write it for you......

The Bush family had financial relationships with all the Bin Laden family (not just Osama).
Just BTW:

A long time ago, the bin Laden family was a sponsor of Williams formula 1 team. Does that mean that Frank Williams had financial relationships with terrorists, in your opinion?
Nope, because frankly I don't believe that the Bin Laden family are terrorists.

... besides Osama.

Yes, naturally...

they betrayed his and now he is paying back!!!!!!