A 700bhp 235mph $510,000 supercar....sound interesting ay?
Engine Type: Twin-turbo Flat-6 Displacement cu in (cc): 229 (3746) Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 700(522) / 7000 Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 657(890) / 4000 Redline at RPM: n.a. Brakes & Tires Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc Tires F-R: 255/35 ZR19 - 335/30 ZR20 Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive Exterior Dimensions & Weight Length × Width × Height in: 175 × 76.5 × 47.2 Weight lb (kg): 3086 (1400) Performance Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 3.2 Top Speed mph (km/h): 235 (375) Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km):
n.a. Exactly 20 years after the legendary CTR “Yellow Bird” and 10 years after the second CTR, RUF announces the all new CTR3. The RUF CTR3 was presented at the grand opening of the new RUF facility in Bahrain. While the first two CTR generations still had their engines in the rear, the new CTR3 has a mid engine design. However, one thing that the CTR3 has in common with its two predecessors is that it is a pure driving machine. The CTR3 is made to involve the driver in the driving experience.
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/ruf_ctr3.asp
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/11/rufctr307_int.jpg
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/11/rufctr307_04.jpg
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/11/rufctr307_01.jpg

sorry already been done twice

alrite delete it then

this has already been done, yeah, but this is much more detailed, with interior pics and more specs than the others...

no thanks. its ugly, way too much red in the interior, and 510 grand. jesus. id rather have a pretty damn nice house. the headliner looks really bad.

0-60 in 3.2? not bad. 1 tenth faster than the gt, which costs less than 1/3 as much, has a nicer looking interior (imo) and looks better on the outside as well. comparo anyone?

no thanks. its ugly, way too much red in the interior, and 510 grand. jesus. id rather have a pretty damn nice house. the headliner looks really bad.

0-60 in 3.2? not bad. 1 tenth faster than the gt, which costs less than 1/3 as much, has a nicer looking interior (imo) and looks better on the outside as well. comparo anyone?

Too much red in the interior? :(

Well I think the car looks alright, if rarity plays a part in ones shopping list, this definitely will be rare. Won't see too many of these on the streets for sure.

worst porsche ever next to it is the Cayenne.

well, in my opinion, the red interior looks excellent, i really love it... its like ferrari style interior red... nice...

as for the exterior, from the front view (last pic), the back looks like its been taken off a carrera GT and the front looks like its been taken off a 911... So I was preferring it to be called the Carrera 911? lol... and the taillights are a mix of the carrera GT and the 911 itself... to me, the whole body looks quite ugly, i only like the interior, the exterior looks horrible to me...

the shifter seems to be set a bit high .. is it because it'll have a sequential transmission ?

Either that or for better reach.

yea, its not really a repost, the pics, the other thread has the interior and almost all the pics aswell, but this has more specs...which are good

as like what i said, this is great looking, love the curves, im not sure if i like the rims on every RUFs, but they are like lightweight or soemthing? but gosh its cool, but im not sure about the sequential thing, the gear shift looks abit too big on the car, it looks weird, but the interior looks awsome, so is the car itself, it re assembles the CGT straight away and its just simply stunning, and gosh, 350 kmh...darn thats going to be quick, but i think its not going to use all that power on the roads because it would basically spin spin spin..and spin, and well, spin...but i htink its going to be great on the Autobahn

this thing is very interesting aswell.
http://www.rsportscars.com/eng/cars/911_alzen.asp
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/08/911400plus07_01.jpg
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/08/911400plus07_05.jpg
Type: Twin-Turbo Flat-6

Displacement cu in (cc): 232 (3800)

Power bhp (kW) at RPM: 1054(776) / 7700

Torque lb-ft (Nm) at RPM: 760(1030) / 5800

Redline at RPM: n.a.

Brakes & Tires

Brakes F/R: ABS, vented disc/vented disc

Tires F-R: n.a.

Driveline: Rear Wheel Drive

Exterior Dimensions & Weight

Length × Width × Height in: n.a.

Weight lb (kg): n.a.

Performance

Acceleration 0-60 mph s: n.a.

Top Speed mph (km/h): > 250 (400)

Fuel Economy EPA city/highway mpg (l/100 km): n.a.

1054hp from a twin turbo flat 6? seems good.

^^yup ,, that Had its own thread as well ;)

That's actually one of the first few Porsches that I actually dont want.

Well the red interior and back 1/2 of that car wanna be GT1 scheme thing...looks completely stupid, the more pics i see of this thing the less i "respect" it

It's class. Especially the interior. If you're not a fan of the outside then you've got to love the inside, it's just bloody fantastic. The specs are fantastic aswell, it's one fast mofo. The rear is pretty elongated actually, but I suppose it helps aerodynamics and does look quite nice from the right angles.