PDA

View Full Version : New Aston Vantage Roadster


gazza
Mar 23, 2007, 6:42 PM
First Drive

http://www.autocar.co.uk/contentImages/Car/AstonMartin/Vantage/4.3V82drRoadster/2237741824.jpg


Aston Martin Vantage

Test date 14 March 2007 Price when new TBA
http://www.autocar.co.uk/contentImages/Car/AstonMartin/Vantage/4.3V82drRoadster/2237741727.jpg

What is it?

Meet the new convertible version of Aston’s smallest, cheapest car, the V8 Vantage. Most people expect every drop-top Aston to assume the Volante title, but the company has chosen to run with the ‘Roadster’ moniker on this occassion, and we think it rather suits the car.
The last Aston convertible we drove – the DB9 Volante – had more shake than the cheesy Welsh crooner who used to go by the name of Stevens. But the engineers have gone to town on this car, with numerous detail modifications to the bodyshell.
First, the car runs a shorter wheelbase, and is therefore inherently stiffer. Aston then carried out a much more detailed computer analysis of the shell and, subsequent to the findings, strengthened the sills and the front and rear crosspanels. Then the sheer panels became structural elements (on the coupe they’re simply aerodynamic aids), and the entire cross car beam (that’s the panel which holds the steering column in place) was improved with a number of cast aluminium components. Many of these modifications will filter back into other cars in the range.
The overall weight is up by just 70kg, but that still leaves a car that casts a very small shadow on the road weighing a portly 1710kg.
Otherwise the car is mechanically identical to the coupe, meaning it runs a 4.3-litre V8 based on the Jaguar motor, but dry sumped and persuaded to produce 380bhp at 7000rpm and 302lb ft at a high 5000rpm. Our test car also came fitted with the Speedshift paddle-shift gearbox that is also now available on the coupe. List price is £90,000, which, by the way, is a full £14k more than a 420bhp Jaguar XKR.
What’s it like?

We’ll leave it to you to decide how much you like the look of it, with the proviso that you must be completely mad if you don’t find it desperately attractive.
The conversion to a canvas roof has been carried out with great attention to detail. The leather-trimmed buttresses behind the seats look entirely homogenous, and the truncated dimensions somehow lend themselves perfectly to the roofless shape. Better looking than the coupe? Too close to call.
It's certainly a quantum leap over the DB9 Volante in the way it resists structural shakes. The Roadster is a very rigid little thing, and only on terrible surfaces does the column shimmy with protest. It matches an XK in this respect.
Not all of the changes from coupe to ragtop make immediate sense. Spring rates, for example, are up around 10 per cent, with accompanying changes to the dampers in bump and rebound. There’s 5mm added ride height (strange, but it’s actually quite noticeable this) and the anti roll bars have been left unchanged. When was the last time a manufacturer added roll stiffness for the convertible variant of a sports car? Nope, I can’t remember either. Aston claims no loss in ride comfort, and it can be believed, so expect these changes to filter into the coupe sometime soon.
And how does it perform? Well, there’s a slight shortfall claimed, but this car actually felt faster than last coupe I drove. The only comment I have to make on the paddle-shift is that people should buy the manual; it is far better. And a new transmission oil has eased that first-to-second shift.
Wind buffeting at speed is minimal, the hood is a one-touch affair and quite fast enough, only the detachable wind deflector detracts from the experience; it's too fiddly.
Should I buy one?

If you’re in the market, yes. It looks the business, drives very well indeed and demand won’t cease for quite some time, keeping prices stable.
The fact that it costs more than the competition doesn’t matter much with this car; it is far more glamorous than any 911 and really deserves comparison with the Ferrari F430 Spider and roofless Lamborghini Gallardo. It might be slower than both, but for pose value, it’s right up there.
First drive data

How much?


Price when new TBA
Price as tested £89,995How fast?


0-62 mph 4.9 sec
Max speed 175 mph
How big?


Weight 1570 kgHow thirsty?


Combined 16.2 mpg
CO2 emissions 358 g/km
Engine


Layout V8 , 4280 cc
Max power 380 bhp at 7300 rpm
Max torque 302 lb ft at 5000 rpm

Koenigseggs Rock
Mar 23, 2007, 8:14 PM
oh the beef is back...it looks lush. i saw a convertible DB9 today but it was raining so hood up :( but they still look beef)

S2K rulz all
Mar 23, 2007, 8:26 PM
That side view of it looks amazing, still for what i would be paying for one of those id expect a bit better performance

!ChEeKy GiRl!
Mar 23, 2007, 8:39 PM
^^ Yeah, I catch you're drift, also, reliability wise, they aren't meant to be that great either. So there's a couple of flaws to watch out for. Getting to look at it/hear it is probably the best bit of owning as Aston.

Maserati Man
Mar 24, 2007, 2:29 AM
i just realized, the new M3's engine is more powerful than this one. it makes more power and roughly the same amount of torque.

how embarrassing.

then again, it's also the best looking Aston Martin, and that's saying a lot.

bennyboy
Mar 28, 2007, 2:18 PM
Yes, it does look fantastic. I expect the performance doesn't really better, because when you drive a car that good looking it doesn't really matter to you, but cmon, the performance is plenty good enough isn't it? If you're not satisifed it's being a little bit picky.

astonmartin138
Mar 28, 2007, 2:20 PM
I think the butresses make it look uber-cool. Maybe even better than the coupe.

R95 ALH
Mar 28, 2007, 5:18 PM
I'd rather have the XKR and save myself 15K

SRT expert
Mar 28, 2007, 5:26 PM
Excellent looking car from Aston Martin. Its just another beautiful piece of machinery, thats all:D

frewin1987
Mar 28, 2007, 5:47 PM
i just realized, the new M3's engine is more powerful than this one. it makes more power and roughly the same amount of torque.

how embarrassing

why's that?? power isn't everything, no way...

btw, i guarantee the V8 Vantage could more than hold its own against the M3... and it sounds SO much better. wet fart vs. pure V8 meaty bellow? take your choice lol...

Ferrari Underground
Mar 29, 2007, 8:24 AM
Holy, that car looks fully sick brah :D :D ! I especially like the side view; it shows its beauty. The taillights from what I saw from the side view look really hot even though they're not much different from the DB9.

That car is great, Aston is coming up with some good models lately. ;)

v@nQu!$h~$
Mar 29, 2007, 10:37 AM
Its DB9 multiplied 6 times without a roof!!

MadLamboFan
Apr 02, 2007, 8:35 AM
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....................... Greate effort by the Aston team, but, you have to try Lambo Spyder that will gives you more pleasure and feel exotic than any other...............
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA............... ..

frewin1987
Apr 02, 2007, 8:43 AM
I'd rather have the XKR and save myself 15K

i feel the same way you know...

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....................... Greate effort by the Aston team, but, you have to try Lambo Spyder that will gives you more pleasure and feel exotic than any other...............
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA............... ..

hmm yeah really funny... :-k. seriously what's funny :confused:.

Robbie
Apr 02, 2007, 8:51 AM
in his mind, after every lambo he talks, he laughs, lambo fans you see...

madFerrariFan
Apr 02, 2007, 8:57 AM
cool lush car, not very good front, but sides are ASTONISHING

frewin1987
Apr 02, 2007, 8:58 AM
in his mind, after every lambo he talks, he laughs, lambo fans you see...

saddo... lol

MadLamboFan
Apr 02, 2007, 9:13 AM
Aston cars are only limited to the James Bond movie...............

frewin1987
Apr 02, 2007, 9:16 AM
Aston cars are only limited to the James Bond movie...............

what are you on about?