New BMW X5 modificated by Hamann


Type: V8
Displacement cu in (cc): 294 (4799)
Power bhp (kW): 400 (298)
Acceleration 0-62 mph s: 5.9
Top Speed mph (km/h): 155 (250) - electronically limited

The car is lowered by 4 inch (10 cm)

It's possible choose 20" or 22" rims

http://autonovita.blogosfere.it/2007/03/bmw-x5-subito-cattiva.html

http://autonovita.blogosfere.it/images/BMW_X5_Hamann_01_1.jpg

http://autonovita.blogosfere.it/images/BMW_X5_Hamann_04_1.jpg

(http://autonovita.blogosfere.it/2007/03/bmw-x5-subito-cattiva.html)

the bottim pic looks great, rims look awesome.. 22's sound good.. 5.9 to 100km/h doesnt sound right, stock it does like 5.7.. anywho..

Oh god, another perfectly decent car ruined by Hamann. And Hamann never seem to do any performance modifications, its always the same old stuff. Thin spoke rims, those big black horrible things, or those 5 spoke thick rims. And a stupid tacky bodykit.[-X

Yeah wtf, I looked at the performance figures firstly and was suprised. 298kw/400HP that's underpowered if you ask me. Very tacky, a bit to escalade/navigator/Hummer H2 esk. Something Snoop Dog would drive around in.

finally, another underpowered modiefied car...sigh...Hamann again, i dont think they did a great job at this, but its still a very ugly car, its even slower, and the front looks so cute that i hate it, dosent look agressive, those rims, i dont know, the many spokes fugly rims looks well, fugly, the whole bodykit is ugly, but i think the rear is okay, but still fugly, a baby would cry after seeing that

the front fender looks great but the rims in the first pic are not.
The rims on the second pic is more fitting than the first IMO.
Would be much better if the performance is tweaked.

Looks really really floppy. The rims on the first one suck and they don't really go well with the car, and teh second one isn't too great either. Would have liked to see more, not some dodgy rims and some black paintwork. It's not crazily fast aswell, and they should have added more power, made it more crazy, given it 500bhp.

uhg looks ugly ,, i dont like it

When I read the the thread title, I thought..ugh, this is gonna be one 'ugly wide blob', have to say I'm pleasantly surprised!
It looks pretty good, and the specs aren't bad either.

ugly as hell. and its stats didnt really wow me either.

This is a very ugly BMW. Another failure by Hamann.

BMW = Big Money Wasted.

Its OK I guess. The first picture looks nice, but not aggressive enough. The second picture looks rather dull -- just some odd rime on a mostly standard X5. I think AC Schnitzer would have made a nicer looking X5. If nothing else, their rims usually look awesome.

Oh god, another perfectly decent car ruined by Hamann. And Hamann never seem to do any performance modifications, its always the same old stuff. Thin spoke rims, those big black horrible things, or those 5 spoke thick rims. And a stupid tacky bodykit.

Very tacky, a bit to escalade/navigator/Hummer H2 esk. Something Snoop Dog would drive around in.

the whole bodykit is ugly, but i think the rear is okay, but still fugly, a baby would cry after seeing that

uhg looks ugly ,, i dont like it

Another failure by Hamann.

http://www.caradisiac.com/media/images/le_mag/mag294/bmw-x5-g.jpg

http://autonovita.blogosfere.it/images/BMW_X5_Hamann_01_1.jpg

First Hamann over does it, then they don't make it aggressive enough. They just can't win. I think everybody here just needs to stop commenting on any Hamann car.

Those two pictures show that the posts I quoted are 100% BS.

Alright, I'm really starting to get sick of Hamanns....