http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/11/29/2008-chrysler-sebring-convertible-debuts/

See the new Sebring convertible at this site.

Scares the bejesus out of me when I look at it. (Negative Comment)

I love it! I just got a new car in my fantasy garage. If it will be priced in the same range as the Megane CC, 307 CC etc., it should prawn.

I've always liked these kinds of cars. It's for the poor båstard that wants an SL but will never be able to afford it... And at least the rear end isn't messed up on this one.

I love it! I just got a new car in my fantasy garage. If it will be priced in the same range as the Megane CC, 307 CC etc., it should prawn.

I've always liked these kinds of cars. It's for the poor båstard that wants an SL but will never be able to afford it... And at least the rear end isn't messed up on this one.

id have a megane cc/pug 307/vaux astra twintop/focus cc over that anyday

Yeah, maybe the Astra, but this would definitely be my second choice. The Renault and the Peugeot look ugly with the roof up.

i dont really like the sebring's design. neither does any of the Top Gear team so that is another British opinion

Ah, don't listen to Top Gear's opinion on American cars. They are a biased bunch of Euro Snobs. Hell, Jeremy Clarkson has admitted that he don't like anything American because of George Bush.

Looks a little bit like a frog on steroids.

I reckon it is better than the Coupe, and the cloth cap and the red all over it does make it look a lot better, although I probably wouldn't buy one, just not really my thing.

Damn that's ugly. Nowhere near as good as the older ones. My sister has one and I think they're damn nice cars but this new one is too ordinary looking.

wow. Ugly outside but pretty nice interior. Sporty but can be used as a family car at the same time due to seating and large trunk space. Practical. Good move but Chrysler. The true question is whether they can eliminate the steroeotype of Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep/Plymouth etc that there cars look good but work like crap. So far this seems like the exact opposite!

This car has quite a few safety features. It's kinda weird though looking at this new model and comparing it with the older and longer model. It looks more like a roadster rather than a convertible

From the side.. it looks like a SL to me and this car doesn't really give me that I want. I prefer this one
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Cadillac/2007/XLR_Platinum/
Anyone mind to do a new thread?

I guess both Caddy and Chrysler should be around the same price.. I prefer the Caddy more.

Exterior looks like ****, the rear end is huge! chrysler interior has been failing too also, but this looks like a step up from recent years.

the front looks pretty good, though abit fugly, the rear is just, i dont know even how to explain how fugfugfugly this is...

the interior i say is actually quite nice, though i hate those dark wood trims...

From the side.. it looks like a SL to me and this car doesn't really give me that I want. I prefer this one
http://www.fast-autos.net/vehicles/Cadillac/2007/XLR_Platinum/
Anyone mind to do a new thread?

I guess both Caddy and Chrysler should be around the same price.. I prefer the Caddy more.I'm sure the XLR will be more expensive than the Chrysler. The XLR is meant to compete with the SL. This Chrysler Sebring is a class or two below it.

I'd never buy one, but I think Sebring's are great cars. My ex girlfriend has an older model. I like the styling and interior of this new one.

It's a world of an improvement... but the front looks like a PT Cruiser.

I realy think that its a big ugly car