PDA

View Full Version : the new 3 fast 3 furious


crusha
Apr 24, 2004, 6:03 AM
its going to be better than the other two movies

12 inch pianist
Apr 24, 2004, 8:30 AM
not hard

H1pNoTiC
Apr 24, 2004, 8:58 AM
The first part was great. The second is dumb! And the threeth may be......

dark_hunter
Apr 24, 2004, 8:59 AM
Are they actually coming out with another one and if they are, why have such a lousy name.

H1pNoTiC
Apr 24, 2004, 9:14 AM
The fist part was great because:
- the car tuning was unbeliveble
- the film was with perfect purport
- Vin Diesel
- and the great girl actors

dark_hunter
Apr 24, 2004, 12:22 PM
crusha where have you heard that they are making a new one?

SubaruKid37
Apr 24, 2004, 3:08 PM
I doubt it would be called 3Fast 3Furious, because thats just crap. I recon that if this is what has been circulated, it will be a misleading name, so that the real name is not yet revealed.

12 inch pianist
Apr 24, 2004, 9:09 PM
its a flim about ricers with flash paint and midly tuned engines (the skyline was the only quick car in the second one). 3fast 3furious could easily be the name considering the type of ppl who think its cool

Attaus
Apr 24, 2004, 9:12 PM
its a flim about ricers with flash paint and midly tuned engines (the skyline was the only quick car in the second one). 3fast 3furious could easily be the name considering the type of ppl who think its cool

What about the Yenko Camaro and the Challenger R/T? 8)

12 inch pianist
Apr 24, 2004, 9:21 PM
they didnt really play a big part did they, i would love both o those cars 2 have bigger roles but did you see them at the front of many posters

SubaruKid37
Apr 25, 2004, 5:02 AM
they didnt really play a big part did they, i would love both o those cars 2 have bigger roles but did you see them at the front of many posters

I agree, I think that they should have played a bigger part not only in the film, but also 'outside' the film.

mattwrx100
Apr 25, 2004, 12:10 PM
wheres this one gonna be NYC maybe

pacman
Apr 26, 2004, 3:25 PM
I think this is just crap...at least the name, some people don't get that the 2 actually means too - too fast too furious - it's quite clever, since it the second part. Now when you look at this, what point would there be in the 3...let me tell you - nothing! about the FF series in general:

The first part really had a point and the director really made this movie, because he wanted to do something about the street-racing world and it came out prety good. Now the second part, was just made to make more money, the director of the first part, as well as Vin Diesel, refused to take part in it and with the exeption of beatiful women and fast cars, it was pretty much crap.

jimkk29
Apr 26, 2004, 6:35 PM
There's NEVER gonna be a "3 Fast 3 Furious".

dark_hunter
Apr 26, 2004, 8:18 PM
There's NEVER gonna be a "3 Fast 3 Furious".I hope so

SpeedMuse
Apr 26, 2004, 11:18 PM
Unfortunately enough idiots would probably go see a 3f3f if they put some 'hot' actresses and actors in it. There's enough stupid little kids to make that movie a hit. Some people are real dumb, dont forget that :D .

KeyserSoze04
Apr 27, 2004, 9:03 AM
But nobody has really explained where they retrieved this info from. I don't think they will be releasing another movie. If so, when?

nutty boy
May 27, 2004, 12:20 PM
i'll explain where he got the info from
he lies alot i should know
3 fast 3 furious is not the name infact he even made the whole third fast and the furious concept up
do not get excited there is not gunna be any such thing of i know of anyway

KeyserSoze04
May 28, 2004, 12:04 PM
i'll explain where he got the info from
he lies alot i should know
3 fast 3 furious is not the name infact he even made the whole third fast and the furious concept up
do not get excited there is not gunna be any such thing of i know of anyway
Exactly...and even if there was it would never be called 3 fast 3 furious..let's be real

Izzy
Jun 03, 2004, 4:16 PM
The first part was great. The second is dumb! And the threeth may be......

Agreee with that.
First part was quite good IMHO,secont part :roll: .that i don't talk obout Torque :shock: :evil:

Axewhlder
Jun 03, 2004, 6:28 PM
Oh man you're kidding me right?

The fist part was great because:
- the car tuning was unbeliveble - if anything it was horrible. Hell, when they popped the hood in the eclipse eariler in the movie they said it had a turbo when you could clearly see it had headers on it. Not to mention his damn floorboard fell out when he hit the nitrous. :roll: I know when I'm running spray INTO THE ENGINE it always affects my floorboards. Only cool cars in that movie were the charger and the supra.

- the film was with perfect purport - The purpose was to glorify and rice out the street racing scene. Most of the stuff in that movie caused cops to crack down on racing and site "hooked up" cars more in general.

- Vin Diesel - Worst. Actor. Ever.
.
- and the great girl actors - I'll agree with this. The girls were pretty hot :shock:

The second installment was better. At least it had musclecars and more realistic racing. It's too bad how they destroyed that EVO though. I could see the uncle ben's flying out of the tailpipe in every scene it was in.

If there is a third movie I'll go see it. I won't lie. They seem to be getting better with the cars they choose. :D

puggles89
Jun 03, 2004, 10:28 PM
if oyu look here is a small piece of info

The Fast and the Furious 3



Vin Diesel In, Paul Walker Out?


According to Dark Horizons, Vin Diesel might return for The Fast and the Furious 3. Paul Walker might not:

"Vin Diesel's deal is 99.9 closed. They're keeping this under wraps while they develop the story because he did have a deal for the second pic that he opted out of. Because of his box office as of late (and the growing fear that "Riddick" may not be the blockbuster that the studio is hoping for) this is a no brainer as he's desperate for the stability a franchise offers. Paul Walker's character as of the early treatments is not involved in anything more than a cameo".

It is unclear whether Tyrese, who co-starred in the second film, will return
this was from http://www.supras.be/carmovies.htm


O and big wrong the skyline and other ricers such as the S200 were the slowest!!!!!!!!!!!!
they had the mods to make em fast. and dig this the yanko camero wich only had headers and 3 inch tips put in was the fstest out of all the cars. running in at. H/O i will post another reply with the times of some of the cars if i can find my older mags with them.(EDIT) dam i round every one but the 2F2F one. well if i find it perdy soon i will post the car times

puggles89
Jun 03, 2004, 11:42 PM
i digged the files up online okie here we go. and i put the mods too, since i didnt have to type.

here is the supra mods
Engine Code: 2JZ-GTE
Type: In-line six, iron block
Internal Modifications: None
External Modifications: GReddy single turbo system, GReddy Power Extreme Exhaust
Engine Management Mods: None
Drivetrain
Layout: Front engine, rear-wheel drive
Drivetrain Modifications: None
Suspension
Front: Stock
Rear: Stock
Brakes
Front: Stock
Rear: Stock
Exterior
Wheels: OZ SuperLeggera,
19x8.5-inch (F),19x10-inch (R)
Tires: Toyo T1-S 245/35ZR-19 (F),
275/30ZR-19 (R)
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time: .5 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed: 94.0 mph
0-30 mph: 2.6 sec.
0-60 mph: 6.4 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.3 sec.
50-70 mph: 3.1 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad): 0.90g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance: DNF
Interior: Sparco Torino seats, Sparco steering wheel, GReddy gauges

skyline:
Engine Code: RB26DETT
Type : In-line six, iron block, aluminum head, twin turbocharged and intercooled
Internal Modifications: None
External Modifications: K&N Ram Air system, HKS Titanium Exhaust, Turbonetic Intercooler
Engine Management Mods: None
Drivetrain
Layout: Front engine, all-wheel drive
Drivetrain Modifications: Front driveshaft removed, Super HICAS disabled
Suspension
Front: JIC Magic shocks, Goldline springs
Rear : JIC Magic shocks, Goldline springs
Brakes
Front: Stop Tech brakes
Rear : Stop Tech brakes
Exterior
Wheels: HRE 446
Tires: Toyo 275/30ZR-19 (F/R)
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time: 14.1 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed: 101.0 mph
0-30 mph: 2.6 sec.
0-60 mph: 6.0 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.1 sec.
50-70 mph: 2.9 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad): 0.91 g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance: 127 ft.
Interior: Sparco harnesses, MOMO steering wheel, Clarion head unit with LCD TV screen, JBL amp, Infinity speakers
the EVO:
Engine Code: 4G63
Type: In-line four, iron block, aluminum head
Internal Modifications: None
External Modifications: None
Engine Management Mods: None
Drivetrain
Layout: Transverse front engine, all-wheel drive
Drivetrain Modifications: None
Suspension
Front: Stock
Rear: Stock
Brakes
Front: Stock
Rear: Stock
Exterior
Wheels: Motegi Racing
Tires: Toyo T1-S, 235/45ZR-17
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time: 15.3 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed: 88.0 mph
0-30 mph: 2.5 sec.
0-60 mph: 7.3 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.7 sec.
50-70 mph: 4.0 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad): 0.94g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance: 125 ft
the RX7:
Engine Code : 13B-REW
Type : Two-rotor Wankel
Internal Modifications : None
External Modifications : 4-inch diameter exhaust tip
Engine Management Mods: None
Drivetrain
Layout : Front engine, rear-wheel drive
Drivetrain Modifications : None
Suspension
Front : Stock
Rear : Stock
Brakes
Front : Stock
Rear : Stock
Exterior
Wheels : RO_JA, 18x7-in. (F), 18x8-in. (R)
Tires : Toyo T1-S, 235/40ZR-18 front, 255/35ZR-18 rear
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time : 14.6 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed : 93.8 mph
0-30 mph : 2.4 sec.
0-60 mph : 6.4 sec.
30-50 mph : 2.6 sec.
50-70 mph : 3.6 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad) : 0.91g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance : 131 ft.
Interior: Sparco Torino seats,
Greddy boost,
EGT and temperature gauges, APC fire extinguisher, Sparco steering wheel
the S2000
Engine Code: F20C1
Type : In-line four, aluminum block
Internal Modifications : None
External Modifications : Comptech supercharger
system with Paxton Novi
1000, Ractive chrome tip
exhaust (non functional)
Engine Management Mods : None
Drivetrain
Layout: Front engine, rear-wheel drive
Drivetrain modifications: None
Suspension
Front: Stock
Rear : Stock
Brakes
Front: Stock
Rear : Stock
Exterior
Wheels: Montegi Racing, 18x7.5-inch
front, 18x8-inch rear
Tires: Toyo T1-S 225/35ZR-18 front,
265/35ZR-18 rear
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time: 13.9 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed: 99.3 mph
0-30 mph: 2.2 sec.
0-60 mph: 5.7 sec.
30-50 mph: 2.2 sec.
50-70 mph: 2.9 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad): 0.94g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance : 139 ft.
Interior: A'PEXi tach, boost, EGT and temperature gauges
and finaly the yanko camaro wich is reallly a camaro with yanko on it

Engine Code: L72
Type : V8, iron block, iron heads
Internal Modifications: None
External Modifications: Headers, Flowmaster mufflers
Engine Management Mods: None
Drivetrain Layout: Front engine, rear-wheel drive
Drivetrain Modifications : None
Suspension
Front: Stock
Rear: Stock
Brakes
Front: Stock
Rear : Stock
Exterior
Wheels: Cragar S/S
Tires: BFGoodrich Radial T/A
Performance
Acceleration
Quarter Mile Time: 13.7 sec.
Quarter Mile Speed: 106.9 mph
0-30 mph: 2.8 sec.
0-60 mph: 5.8 sec.
30-50 mph: 1.7 sec.
50-70 mph: 2.3 sec.
Handling
Lateral Grip (200-ft skidpad): 0.73g
Braking
60-0 stopping distance : 138 ft.
Interior: Stock

cant wait to see how long this post will be.

Attaus
Jun 03, 2004, 11:48 PM
Well, don't forget that there was NO Evo in the U.S. without 2F2F. There would be NO Evo if it wasn't for 2F2F. I think that "3F3F" would be good if there was a sh*t load of drifting in it.. and cars with more money under the hood rather than on the hood.

nutty boy
Jun 04, 2004, 6:10 AM
thank you puggles89 for the info i stopped reading at the evo it took to long
and Attaus it is not going to be called 3f3f if it does come out

SubaruKid37
Jun 04, 2004, 8:56 AM
thank you puggles89 for the info i stopped reading at the evo it took to long
and Attaus it is not going to be called 3f3f if it does come out
hence why it was "3F3F" not 3F3F, because no-one has a better name for it yet.
And Attaus, I totally agree with your ""more money under the hood than on the hood"" :lol:

puggles89
Jun 04, 2004, 5:46 PM
yes. o and yes you have probebly noticed that only 6 cars are there. the mitsu and charger never made it to the testing.

pilone
Jun 05, 2004, 5:49 AM
Please, if you have, some informations and fotos of the new 3 fast 3 furious!!

nutty boy
Jun 05, 2004, 7:27 AM
welcome to the forum pilone
and 3 fast 3 furious is not real

RiceBoy
Jun 09, 2004, 8:18 PM
hey pilone. welcome to the forum :D

but really..."The Fast and the Furious" should just be called "The Slow and the Silly"

And about the turbo-less eclipse-they dubbed in the turbo noises in the movie

psh
Jun 09, 2004, 9:08 PM
Well, don't forget that there was NO Evo in the U.S. without 2F2F. There would be NO Evo if it wasn't for 2F2F. I think that "3F3F" would be good if there was a sh*t load of drifting in it.. and cars with more money under the hood rather than on the hood.
Street racing usually has little to nothing to do with drifting. Most of the time it's an issue of who can run the 1/4 mile faster. And maybe in some rare cases who is able to finish 1/2 mile first. I don't think the opening race in 2F2F would ever happen in street racing. Maybe if the 3rd installment took place somewhere in Japan. A lot of people over there like to go touge racing (racing each other on the mountains) so you see a lot of drifting taking place there. But if you ask any professional drivers they will all tell you that skidding is not the fastest way around a turn. Drifting is more of a showpiece than an efficient way of racing. UNLESS you're talking about ice racing or perhaps rally racing, but that is only because of the types of conditions those drivers have to deal with.

I do agree with your opinion that the cars shoudl have more money under the hood than on the hood. Anyone can see that these cars don't accurately portray trully tuned cars, but when it comes to street racing you have to realize that most people don't have any money under the hood. People are more into showing off their rides and only a select few actually go the whole 9 yards in tuning their cars to the point of running better than average numbers on the 1/4 mile. In any case, those few that really do tune their cars are probably among the last people to let Universal Pictures borrow their cars for a movie that really doesn't do them justice. So what you end up with is the flashier street racing crowd who have little more than asthetic changes to their vehicles.

I think it's time we draw back the attention from something as vain and fleeting as street racing. We should look ahead and focus our attention on the stuff that really counts. Things like Time Attack are just around the corner for those of us who aren't living in Japan. It's a true test of skills and tuning ability, much more than mere straight line speed.

RiceBoy
Jun 09, 2004, 10:41 PM
Well, don't forget that there was NO Evo in the U.S. without 2F2F. There would be NO Evo if it wasn't for 2F2F. I think that "3F3F" would be good if there was a sh*t load of drifting in it.. and cars with more money under the hood rather than on the hood.
Street racing usually has little to nothing to do with drifting. Most of the time it's an issue of who can run the 1/4 mile faster. And maybe in some rare cases who is able to finish 1/2 mile first. I don't think the opening race in 2F2F would ever happen in street racing. Maybe if the 3rd installment took place somewhere in Japan. A lot of people over there like to go touge racing (racing each other on the mountains) so you see a lot of drifting taking place there. But if you ask any professional drivers they will all tell you that skidding is not the fastest way around a turn. Drifting is more of a showpiece than an efficient way of racing. UNLESS you're talking about ice racing or perhaps rally racing, but that is only because of the types of conditions those drivers have to deal with.

I do agree with your opinion that the cars shoudl have more money under the hood than on the hood. Anyone can see that these cars don't accurately portray trully tuned cars, but when it comes to street racing you have to realize that most people don't have any money under the hood. People are more into showing off their rides and only a select few actually go the whole 9 yards in tuning their cars to the point of running better than average numbers on the 1/4 mile. In any case, those few that really do tune their cars are probably among the last people to let Universal Pictures borrow their cars for a movie that really doesn't do them justice. So what you end up with is the flashier street racing crowd who have little more than asthetic changes to their vehicles.

I think it's time we draw back the attention from something as vain and fleeting as street racing. We should look ahead and focus our attention on the stuff that really counts. Things like Time Attack are just around the corner for those of us who aren't living in Japan. It's a true test of skills and tuning ability, much more than mere straight line speed.

Couldn't have put it better :D

But anyway, i recall a time when i watched the first movie...and i remember vin diesel saying to the golf driving guy (c'mon, a golf) to not race the guy in the black s2k. I think he said that it had $100k under the hood, while in stark contrast to real life, the car only has a supercharger and some other tidbits...and i doubt the budget ever reached $100k.

Rouin
Jun 09, 2004, 10:51 PM
i thought the s2000 in the first Fast & the Furious was hilarious. Comptech Supercharged, and gets exactly the same 1/4 mile times as a stock s2000, if not a little worse. thousands of dollars for nothing. must be the extra pounds of NEEDLESS VINYL on that car. oh and amps and subwoofers. i never understood the point to amps and subs in cars... extra weight for trivial things...

i'm talkin about the pink one btw.

jimkk29
Jun 10, 2004, 5:26 AM
Excellent post psh.

M Technik
Jun 12, 2004, 3:35 AM
Hmm..the first one was about Drag Racing, the second was about Circuit Racing and the third one..? Maybe Drift?! I damn well hope so.

psh
Jun 13, 2004, 1:29 AM
Hmm..the first one was about Drag Racing, the second was about Circuit Racing and the third one..? Maybe Drift?! I damn well hope so.
Actually the first one was about a street racing crew who hijacked 18 wheelers to sell off electronics so they could maintain their lifestyle. There was an undercover cop (Paul Walker) who was trying to drive among them to find out who was pulling the jobs. Once he find out who's behind it (Vin Diesel) he decides he doesn't want to bust him so he lets him get away.
The second had to do with a drug dealer who needed to move some money very quickly because he knows that the location is being watched by the cops. So he decides to pick up some fast street racers (Paul Walker and Tyrese) to move the cash for him.
Both movies had their share of drag type racing. I'm not sure why Universal decided to film the first race in the 2nd movie since street racers don't tend to have the man power nor do they cooperate long enough to pull off a street track type race. The rest of the driving scenes in the 2nd movie involved a bunch of highway chase scenes and that one 2-way drag between the imports (eclipse and evo) and those domestic muscle cars (challenger and yenko).
In any case, the American Film industry probably wouldn't be able to accurately depict the drift culture without the consultation of a prominent figure in drifting such as Keiichi Tsuchiya. And maybe if there was some joint collaboration with the people who did Initial D (in the hopes of creating a plot that isn't complete and utter bull, because we all know that plot isn't a strong point in most action films). I mean I can't see any way for Universal to continue the Fast and Furious story while trying to incorporate something like drifting. When I watch most action movies today it feels like they've shoved in this senseless plot just to fill in the blanks between the action sequences (as they often do in porn). And The Fast and the Furious series is no exception to that statement.

underground racer
Jun 14, 2004, 12:15 PM
hey pilone. welcome to the forum :D

but really..."The Fast and the Furious" should just be called "The Slow and the Silly"

And about the turbo-less eclipse-they dubbed in the turbo noises in the movie

Anybody read the SCC mag about the 2 Fast 2 Furious cars, pulling the awd out of the Skyline so that it would drift better, most of the cars and if my memory serves me correctly, all of the tested slower than there stock counterparts

Mondeo Cosworth
Jun 18, 2004, 7:23 AM
They're slower because they carry about 500tons of ICE.

M Technik
Jul 03, 2004, 9:30 AM
In any case, the American Film industry probably wouldn't be able to accurately depict the drift culture without the consultation of a prominent figure in drifting such as Keiichi Tsuchiya. And maybe if there was some joint collaboration with the people who did Initial D (in the hopes of creating a plot that isn't complete and utter bull, because we all know that plot isn't a strong point in most action films). I mean I can't see any way for Universal to continue the Fast and Furious story while trying to incorporate something like drifting. When I watch most action movies today it feels like they've shoved in this senseless plot just to fill in the blanks between the action sequences (as they often do in porn). And The Fast and the Furious series is no exception to that statement.

Ahh...the one and only 'dorikin'. I reckon Universal could do something half-decent with the D1GP. Just seeing all the guys, Kazama, Taniguchi. I reckon it would be cool.

puggles89
Jul 16, 2004, 12:26 AM
if EA games brought japanese people with there cars to america to capture the art of the drift in NFS underground. then i am pretty sure the ameican movie biss will bring over japanse people with there cars over here to shoot drifting. and i would not be surprised at all if they film this in toyko. or make a fake toyko back round hahahahaha.

one thing why the crap take out the sweet Awd system in a gtr to make it move faster on drag???..... that is what the gst skylines are for!!
there goes another sweet time attack car #-o ](*,)

Importfan
Jul 16, 2004, 6:52 PM
I have found some info on this topic and they have come out with a time it will come out if they make the movie. they say it will be released in the summer of 2005. Here is the info.
http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hp&cf=prev&id=1808497482

Importfan
Jul 16, 2004, 7:02 PM
IMO i hope they dont come out with a third movie because the second movie was nothing compared to the first movie. These movies were all from Universal Theathers and they like dragging the movies on as seen in Jurrasic Park, how many islands can u find that have dinosaurs on them. Its BS. They probably keep dragging the street racing movies out till were they arent interesting anymore, Because I lost all interest in Jurassic Park after the first one. Same with The Fast and The Furious, Im lossing interest in the movie because they are dragging it on.

SpeedMuse
Jul 17, 2004, 3:30 PM
The fist part was great because:
- the car tuning was unbeliveble
- the film was with perfect purport
- Vin Diesel
- and the great girl actors

I think the acting in both F&F and 2F2F was just awful. And as Pianist said, its not too hard to top those movies.

And this has just been bothering me... How could an EVO and Eclipse Spyder with only slight engine mods be racing past and ahead of a Viper SRT-10 :shock: ????? That kind of fake stuff gets me mad :evil: .

puggles89
Jul 18, 2004, 11:44 PM
i agree with import fan. F@F 3 may be so awful.

Izzy
Jul 21, 2004, 5:17 PM
Can't be worse than FnF 2 :D

FerrariChic4u02
Jul 21, 2004, 5:26 PM
I love those 2 movies even if the second wasn't that great...Vin Diesel Was So0o Hot in those movies ! :twisted: :wink:

Ghalos
Jul 21, 2004, 6:07 PM
Yeah, the whole thing about the Viper and Vette getting past by an evo, err...cereal box toy...errr..fart rocket...err..oh forget it...

And WHO THE HELL WOULD TRADE AN EVO FOR A SKYLINE!!?!?!!?!?!?!?!

Oh wait, I know, Universal, because Mitsubishi said so...Honestly, that movie made me glad mistubishi is going under, i'm sick of these movies, and the only reason I'll see the third one is because of the cars, but I'm not paying to see this hutzpuh... :x

Trowa184
Jul 24, 2004, 11:53 AM
its a flim about ricers with flash paint and midly tuned engines (the skyline was the only quick car in the second one). 3fast 3furious could easily be the name considering the type of ppl who think its cool

What about the Yenko Camaro and the Challenger R/T? 8)

The skyline was slow in real life. They tested all of the cars. I think the Yenko Camaro was the fastest in real life (ran 13.0) then the Challenger, and I forget the rest but the Skyline ran 14s LOL. And both movies were FAKE! I hate ricers who think that movie is soo cool when its all fake. In the 1st one they were racing 1/4 or mile or w/e in the 1st race and theyre racing for 5 mins doing over 150. The second one seemed a little realer but sucks too. Bc the speedometers actually didnt goto 160 in a few seconds. These movies SUCK.


That is all.

TheCivicProject
Jul 24, 2004, 2:59 PM
First of all, anyone who takes these movies seriously is an IDIOT. that 1/4 mile race in the first one too was funny. It may have been a half mile, but im not sure. Skyline wasnt the only fast car in the second one, i believe they had another RX7 in the first race. Another thing about the Evo passing the other cars would be; its a highway, people on road, perhaps if it was a real situation, someone might have grabbed an opportunity more quickly than the guy in the viper. I mean i was messing around with a Z06, i knew he would win, but hell he didnt because he didnt want to grow balls, i took the breakdown lane, he got stuck behind a white ford minivan.

Import_Tuner420
Nov 29, 2004, 5:56 AM
Yeah 2F2F's opening Race had a Honda S2000 (The pink Girly Car) The Red RX-7 (The Crazy Mexican or whatever he was) The Weird Gold looking Supra (The whiney guy with the whack ass hair. Didn't his g/f call him "Slap-Jack?") and ofcourse, the Skyline. Now hold on... The Skyline is not "slow" in real life. Given it doesn't have a great acceleration time, but it's known more for it's high-end power. A 6-Speed, Twin Turbo, 4 Wheel Drive ATTESA Ricer will give any old Muscle car a run for it's money. You're not going to convince anyone who's done their homework on the car that it sucks or that it's slow.. After all...was the Yenko or any other car in 2F2F banned from a Stock Racing Circuit for having an unfair advantage over all other cars? Well...The Skyline Was. Austraila decided after one season of three teams armed with R-33's leading the points standing that it was enough, and banished the car forever on the tracks. Must have been the way they handle at high speeds... lmao get a clue. Below is posted a Review of a Skyline. Enjoy.

1999 has seen the introduction of the new Skyline R34 GT-R, with a wealth of history behind it and an enviable reputation to live up to. A ‘super-evolution’ of the model it replaced, the R34 GT-R is more advanced in every respect. Its body is stiffer and its aerodynamics package is further refined, and in V-spec features front and rear carbonfibre diffusers under the car, and dual wing adjustable aerofoil on the bootlid. Among the many technical refinements under the bonnet are twin ceramic intercooled turbochargers, which effectively eliminate turbo-lag. There is also more torque and better power delivery.

A six-speed Getrag transmission now delivers the engine’s output to the wheels. Improvements have been made to the ATTESA four-wheel drive system, which features E-TS, or Electronic Torque Split. This gives the driver the entertainment of a 100 per cent rear-wheel drive car, together with the traction and safety of a 50:50 four-wheel drive system when conditions demand it. This is further backed up by ‘intelligent’ electronic limited-slip differential. Refinements to the Super HICAS rear-wheel steer system include an electronic yaw-rate Feedback Control System for even more precise control of the rear wheels in extreme situations.

The aerodynamic efficiency of the Skyline GT-R has evolved from lessons learned and information gathered on the racetrack. This not only ensures that the car incorporates all the latest visible aerodynamic aids to help smooth the airflow, but also includes hidden items such as the front and rear diffusers fitted under the floor pan. Under high speed driving, the parts that project below the body, such as the engine and rear axle, will normally produce ‘lift’ however by covering the engine and rear differential, the airflow is smoother and less turbulent. In addition, the shape of the Skyline’s rear diffuser is designed to produce downforce and it also helps to cool the differential. A two-stage rear spoiler design manufactured in aluminium alloy is capable of adjustment ranging from 10 to 30 degrees to provide differing degrees of downforce.

The RB26DETT in-line, 2568cc six-cylinder engine retains the previous 280bhp at 6,800 rpm of its predecessor but has been developed to provide more torque for maximum driveability from lower rpm without compromising top end power. Quicker turbo response has also been achieved through the use of new turbochargers. Power is fed through a new six-speed close ratio Getrag gearbox.The basic engine goes back some nine years and was first developed for racing. In racing specification the engine comfortably produces upwards of 507bhp.

posted from http://search.hp.netscape.com/hp/boomframe.jsp?query=Nissan+Skyline+R-34&page=1&offset=1&result_url=redir%3Fsrc%3Dwebsearch%26req uestId%3D78620759c6248ad9%26clickedItemR ank%3D6%26userQuery%3DNissan%2BSkyline%2 BR-34%26clickedItemURN%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252 Fwww.ultimatecarpage.com%252Fframe.php%2 53Ffile%253Dcar.php%2526carnum%253D395%2 6invocationType%3D-%26fromPage%3DHPPAVTop%26amp%3BampTest%3 D1&remove_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ultimatecarp age.com%2Fframe.php%253Ffile%253Dcar.php %2526carnum%253D395

Read this and then think about the difference between this car, and the old ass muscle car. This car established itself Years ago in Japan, and for what it's worth, I used to think the world of Muscle Cars. But some of us like driving and cornering, not just drag racing. And you won't find a single muscle car running a course like a Skyline can. I'll quote Alan Grant from the famed Jurassic Park scene when he gave the speech on the Raptor. "Try and show a little Respect?" :cool:

jimkk29
Nov 29, 2004, 4:56 PM
Dude...

1. There will never be a 3F3F movie.
2. This topic is soooo outdated!

Locked.