PDA

View Full Version : 2006 SSC Ultimate Aero


DriftingShinobi
Mar 21, 2006, 6:33 AM
http://www.supercars.net/cars/3339.html

New Supercar hits the scene. However looks too much like a Diablo but if the stats and the manufacturers test results are anything to go by, the comparison between the two will end there, on looks. More powerful, faster and quicker than the over-rated and way too heavy (imo) Veyron 16.4, this can gon make some tsunami sized ripples in the car industry. What are your opinions?

Juggernaut
Mar 21, 2006, 8:02 AM
welcome to SCF but this is old news my take : this car won't see production. There has been too many entreprenuers with a dime in the pocket and harbouring supercar ambitions

car lover !!
Mar 21, 2006, 8:23 AM
Old news...
But this is the Veyron Rival and don't make any "This VS Veyron"...
This car is better than veyron IMO...

pacman
Mar 21, 2006, 8:41 AM
I've seen this thing before...which means I've already done all my vomiting and now I only get a little sick when I look at it.

Ugly, ugly, ugly...

DriftingShinobi
Mar 21, 2006, 9:06 AM
Damn. 1 of 2 reasons for the replies to this thread so far
1. People are so tired of the supercar war any new supercar released is frowned upon or,
2. The damn thread already exists soemwhere on or another forum.

Ghalos
Mar 21, 2006, 10:07 AM
Damn. 1 of 2 reasons for the replies to this thread so far
1. People are so tired of the supercar war any new supercar released is frowned upon or,
2. The damn thread already exists soemwhere on or another forum.


Actually, it does exist elsewhere, I made the thread on it. =P

I still love it. It's fast, and really, that's all that matters.

lambo or holden
Mar 21, 2006, 2:11 PM
This was done a while ago.

Its a good car though.

Ghalos I like your new sig.

Driftster
Mar 21, 2006, 3:21 PM
maybe it's because it's an ugly piece of crap 1 off car..

BMW ///M3
Mar 21, 2006, 3:30 PM
maybe it's because it's an ugly piece of crap 1 off car..

believe it or not they want to put that thing into production.

they are trying to get it to meet safety and emissions reqs.

Driftster
Mar 21, 2006, 3:32 PM
well it'll never meet them because it will be a ocular hazard to the rest of the drivers on the road.

DriftingShinobi
Mar 22, 2006, 3:41 AM
well it'll never meet them because it will be a ocular hazard to the rest of the drivers on the road.
How is it not going to meet the emmision standards when the veyron has twice the number of cylinders plus its quad-turbo? It might not meet the safety requirements mainly coz of its weight (Damn regulations, making all the good cars wieght enough, i mean how can an Evo or WRX STI weight 1500kgs? Total bullshit).

It will however be a hazard coz it will be blowing past everybody including the veyron (even with the limiter removed). Only if it does go into production.

viper boy
Mar 23, 2006, 9:14 AM
nice ride....

Driftster
Mar 23, 2006, 12:48 PM
How is it not going to meet the emmision standards when the veyron has twice the number of cylinders plus its quad-turbo? It might not meet the safety requirements mainly coz of its weight (Damn regulations, making all the good cars wieght enough, i mean how can an Evo or WRX STI weight 1500kgs? Total bullshit).

It will however be a hazard coz it will be blowing past everybody including the veyron (even with the limiter removed). Only if it does go into production.

1st Why quote what i said then talk about emissions?

No one said a WORD about emissions..

and since when does # of cylinders = Emissions...
Seriously..Think kiddo..

Evo and STi's weight alot becuase they're fat pieces of crap..not because of regulations

viper boy
Mar 23, 2006, 2:13 PM
ok its because not everybody thinks about emisions right away man

Venom 1000
Mar 25, 2006, 7:29 PM
1st Why quote what i said then talk about emissions?

No one said a WORD about emissions..

and since when does # of cylinders = Emissions...
Seriously..Think kiddo..

Evo and STi's weight alot becuase they're fat pieces of crap..not because of regulations

go easy, he just started out and probably doesnt know a whole lot.

Attaus
Mar 26, 2006, 12:47 AM
http://www.supercars.net/cars/3339.html

New Supercar hits the scene. However looks too much like a Diablo but if the stats and the manufacturers test results are anything to go by, the comparison between the two will end there, on looks. More powerful, faster and quicker than the over-rated and way too heavy (imo) Veyron 16.4, this can gon make some tsunami sized ripples in the car industry. What are your opinions?

.. over rated? hahaha..

..what?


SSC.. whatever. Anyone can make a fast car. It's probably not as livable as the Veyron.

(Drifster = pwned)


Oh, and.. good luck keeping a 2,700lb 1,050 hp RWD car on the road.

pilone
Mar 26, 2006, 7:00 AM
Thank you for the old news! :)
Anyway welcome on SCF DriftingShinobi!!

From Zambia??
Sounds good

:driving

Double 12
Mar 26, 2006, 8:06 AM
Thank you for the old news! :)
Anyway welcome on SCF DriftingShinobi!!

From Zambia??
Sounds good

:driving The most members are from North-America, Australia and Europe...there are some members from the other continents but we need more....

This is now mainly an American forum :(

Venom 1000
Mar 26, 2006, 12:21 PM
.. over rated? hahaha..

..what?

great post..lol


SSC.. whatever. Anyone can make a fast car. It's probably not as livable as the Veyron.

(Drifster = pwned)


Oh, and.. good luck keeping a 2,700lb 1,050 hp RWD car on the road.

1050hp is too much power for just 2 wheels. the TVR Speed 12 didn't even have that much power and it was a pain just keep it on the track. the Veyron weighs alot and is AWD so it doesnt come out like another speed 12

thajuiceman
May 23, 2006, 8:13 AM
It may be old news, but it's new news to me. I'm always excited when a new car boasts those kinds of numbers. This car is how I found these forums. I hope to talk more cars with all of you.